- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 23 Aug 2019
Housing Infrastructure Fund - laying the foundations
|In August 2019, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Sajid Javid, announced over £600m of additional funding for five projects from the Housing Infrastructure Fund (HIF).|
The Housing Infrastructure Fund (HIF) forms part of the broader National Productivity Investment Fund announced by the previous Chancellor Philip Hammond in 2016. It comprises a £5.5bn pot of money designed to make more land available for housing and deliver physical infrastructure to support new and existing communities.
The most recent announcement of £600m is part of the Forward Fund, which is substantially larger than the Marginal Viability Fund and typically reserved for strategic infrastructure projects that unlock large-scale housing developments, such as train stations or significant road upgrades.
Individual bids for marginal viability are capped at £10m, as the government’s aim is for local authorities to use it for “the final, or missing, piece of infrastructure funding to get additional sites... unblocked quickly”.
Part of the conditions which the government attaches to the funding is that it must be spent within a certain time period. This means that successful awards of funding are often given to schemes that are already well advanced in their planning phase.
The ICE policy team has been speaking to stakeholders, including many from our membership, about the effectiveness of HIF funding as part of the evidence-gathering activities for our forthcoming State of the Nation report on improving connectivity between infrastructure and housing.
There was consensus that HIF funding is delivering better integrated infrastructure and housing for many local communities. However, there was also some concern expressed at the methodology for awarding HIF funding and how this is unfairly penalising areas with lower land values.
While there is no doubt that areas of highest housing and infrastructure demand should be prioritised, it was clear from the stakeholders we spoke to that the government should consider allocating a separate portion of HIF for areas of lower land value, ensuring that strategic sites nationwide are unlocked for housing development.
In addition, there are still improvements that can be made to HIF, such as moving to a continuous programme of funding rather than defined bidding rounds. This can ensure a more strategic approach to infrastructure provision and enable bidders to take a more measured approach in their applications.
 State of the Nation 2019: connecting infrastructure and housing
 About this article
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Affordable housing.
- Brexit - The case for infrastructure.
- Community infrastructure levy.
- Government construction and infrastructure pipelines.
- Green infrastructure.
- Growth and Infrastructure Act.
- Home ownership.
- Housing associations.
- Housing standards review.
- Infrastructure and Projects Authority.
- Infrastructure UK (IUK).
- National Infrastructure Pipeline.
- National Infrastructure Plan.
- Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects.
- The future of housing.
Featured articles and news
1 minute read.
An alternative to secondary ventilation stacks in tall buildings.
How to deliver the infrastructure the country needs.
Protecting employees from hearing damage.
One of the largest office buildings in the world.
Who holds the risk for COVID-19?
Insights from New York.
A quick introduction to a very complicated subject.
CIOB suggests the economic reach of construction is double the official figures.
The first US building to achieve BREEAM Outstanding In-Use.
70 buildings from 70 years of Concrete Quarterly. Book review.