Historical versus Modern: identity through imitation
Historical versus Modern: identity through imitation, Barbara Engel (editor) with Johannes Blechschmidt, Max Mutsch and Philine Schneider, Jovis Verlag GmbH. 2018, 213 pages, many urban plans and colour illustrations.
In an age of rapid urban growth, the longing for stability and rootedness has often fostered a return to historical forms and local identities. Across the world, city districts are being historicised during the process of reconstruction. This German (English language) publication examines a number of international projects exemplifying the trend. The authors’ aim is to understand the motivations behind them and whether they provide models of good urban design. The 14 selected examples vary widely, from reconstruction after loss with the aim of recovering their history, to new ‘Old Cities’ that provide an invented past. There are also copied places where imitation becomes an urban development principle in order to create a tourist magnet.
The book is edited by Barbara Engel, who has followed the contested discussions on this topic over several years. In most instances she has found that public opinion, which predominantly supports historicising new constructions, is diametrically opposed by conservation professionals, urban planners and architects. This makes it a difficult subject and the book skilfully avoids taking an unduly partisan approach. Yet there is a sense that collective memory is a powerful driver for recovering history. The book raises many interesting lines of enquiry, for example, can lost identities be retrieved with reconstructed buildings, and is the multi-faceted nature of urban history accurately reflected in present-day recreations?
The book is divided into four sections, each featuring between two and five urban development plans. The first is Reconstruction after Loss, which includes the Polish city of Elbing, which was largely destroyed in 1945 and rebuilt in a contemporary interpretation of its original historic form. This makes for a townscape that recalls the original merchant town, but it is criticised by many local historians and architects as a vision of what an old town might look like rather than the reality of the one that was destroyed. A more polarised debate has taken place between traditionalists and modernists over the Dom-Römer area of Frankfurt. This resulted in a mix of both historical reconstructions and contemporary designs, but with little thought given to their harmonisation.
Section 2, titled Copied Spaces, considers China’s practice of imitating western European landmarks and districts. Two new satellite towns in Shanghai are featured. Anting is intended to represent a modern ecologically-based model of a German city, while Thames Town imitates British small-town typology, with Stratford-on-Avon used as the template. Next comes New Old Cities, a concept involving construction of an imagined past, with the aim of fostering neighbourliness, social cohesion and sense of place. The prime example is Poundbury, but more remarkable is the postmodern historicism displayed at the new town of Haverleij in the Netherlands, and a brave attempt to challenge the American love of the suburbs at the Mercado District in Tucson, Arizona.
The final section examines Transformations of History, which see cities not as static constructs but as places subject to constant change. An example is Skopje 2014, a state-sponsored regeneration project focused on the urban core of the capital city of the Republic of Macedonia, which aims to project a new interpretation of national history. Populist in nature, this involves renovating existing buildings, façade-cladding buildings of the Socialist era, and creating monuments, sculptures and even a triumphal arch.
Although the examples chosen to illustrate these international approaches to ‘heritage-based’ regeneration are difficult to compare, given the lack of consistency in planning regimes, politics and cultural values, the book raises many pertinent questions about the methods that are being used, their capacity for strengthening local identity and their lasting value.
Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Architectural styles.
- British post war mass housing.
- Demolishing Modernism: Britain's lost post-war gems.
- Historic England.
- IHBC articles.
- Mimetic architecture.
- The Inquiry - Mansion House Square v. Number 1 Poultry.
- The Institute of Historic Building Conservation.
- Vernacular architecture.
A mapping tool that provides contractors and their suppliers with a central database of local Materials Exchange Platform (MEP) projects to help cut waste by finding a home for unused materials has been launched.
An air raid shelter, a pillbox cleverly disguised as a roofless cottage, a rare Chain Home radar defence tower, and a war memorial have been granted protection.
A planning application has been submitted by Derby City Council to knock down the Assembly Rooms – which has played host to the likes of Elton John, Iron Maiden, Take That, etc.
Specifically tailored for conservation projects, the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) has launched two brand new professional services contracts.
Liverpool Mayor Joe Anderson has made a dramatic intervention into the zip wire row which has divided people, politicians and businesses in the city.
The roof of the Elizabeth Tower (also known as Big Ben) is slowly becoming visible again from 28 September 2020, as part of the scaffolding is removed.
The IHBC lists quality providers of education and learning in the historic built environment, and emails a monthly recap of their upcoming events.
On Læsø, houses are thatched with thick, heavy bundles of silvery seaweed that have the potential to be a contemporary building material around the world.
For the first time in its history, England’s largest festival of heritage and culture will feature online events as well as in-person activities. Heritage Open Days (HODs) returns in September, thanks to support from players of People’s Postcode Lottery.
The Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA) shows the scale of the ‘missed opportunity’ if we continue to separate heritage policymaking and economic policymaking.