Control of Vibration at Work Regulations
Key takeaways
The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005 require employers to manage health risks from both hand-arm and whole-body vibration. Daily exposure action and limit values define when interventions are needed. Employers must carry out risk assessments, implement controls, provide training and health surveillance, and engage with workers in managing these risks.
Background
The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005, a UK Statutory Instrument under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (SI 2005/1093), came into force on 6 July 2005 to protect employees from health hazards associated with vibration at work. These regulations address two key forms of vibration: hand-arm vibration, arising from the use of hand-held or hand-guided tools, and whole-body vibration, typically transmitted through seats or by standing on vibrating machinery
Central to the regulations are defined exposure action values (EAVs) and exposure limit values (ELVs). Employers must act to reduce exposure once the action value is reached and must ensure the limit value is not exceeded.
Employers are required to undertake a suitable and sufficient risk assessment to identify employees at risk, consider the magnitude and duration of exposure, and evaluate the vulnerability of certain individuals. Based on this assessment, the employer must implement appropriate control measures following a hierarchy of control. This may include substituting equipment, using low-vibration tools, changing work processes, introducing rest breaks or job rotation, and keeping equipment well-maintained
Where the risk assessment shows a risk to health, the regulations mandate health surveillance to detect early signs of disorders like hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) or vibration-related back issues. Should health effects arise, employers must review controls, provide advice, and consider assigning alternative work. Employers must also inform and train employees about the risks, control measures, exposure values, findings from assessments, and how to spot and report symptoms. Worker consultation is also required, ensuring that those affected are involved in the risk management process.
Failing to comply with these regulations can lead to enforcement action by the Health and Safety Executive, including prosecution. Cases have emerged where organisations have been fined for neglecting to manage vibration risks appropriately.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
The sad story of Derby Hippodrome
An historic building left to decay.
ECA, JIB and JTL back Fabian Society call to invest in skills for a stronger built environment workforce.
Women's Contributions to the Built Environment.
Calls for the delayed Circular Economy Strategy
Over 50 leading businesses, trade associations and professional bodies, including CIAT, and UKGBC sign open letter.
The future workforce: culture change and skill
Under the spotlight at UK Construction Week London.
A landmark moment for postmodern heritage.
A safe energy transition – ECA launches a new Charter
Practical policy actions to speed up low carbon adoption while maintaining installation safety and competency.
Frank Duffy: Researcher and Practitioner
Reflections on achievements and relevance to the wider research and practice communities.
The 2026 Compliance Landscape: Fire doors
Why 'Business as Usual' is a Liability.
Cutting construction carbon footprint by caring for soil
Is construction neglecting one of the planet’s most powerful carbon stores and one of our greatest natural climate allies.
ARCHITECTURE: How's it progressing?
Archiblogger posing questions of a historical and contextual nature.
The roofscape of Hampstead Garden Suburb
Residents, architects and roofers need to understand detailing.
Homes, landlords. tenants and the new housing standards
What will it all mean?


















