Control of Vibration at Work Regulations
Key takeaways
The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005 require employers to manage health risks from both hand-arm and whole-body vibration. Daily exposure action and limit values define when interventions are needed. Employers must carry out risk assessments, implement controls, provide training and health surveillance, and engage with workers in managing these risks.
Background
The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations 2005, a UK Statutory Instrument under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (SI 2005/1093), came into force on 6 July 2005 to protect employees from health hazards associated with vibration at work. These regulations address two key forms of vibration: hand-arm vibration, arising from the use of hand-held or hand-guided tools, and whole-body vibration, typically transmitted through seats or by standing on vibrating machinery
Central to the regulations are defined exposure action values (EAVs) and exposure limit values (ELVs). Employers must act to reduce exposure once the action value is reached and must ensure the limit value is not exceeded.
Employers are required to undertake a suitable and sufficient risk assessment to identify employees at risk, consider the magnitude and duration of exposure, and evaluate the vulnerability of certain individuals. Based on this assessment, the employer must implement appropriate control measures following a hierarchy of control. This may include substituting equipment, using low-vibration tools, changing work processes, introducing rest breaks or job rotation, and keeping equipment well-maintained
Where the risk assessment shows a risk to health, the regulations mandate health surveillance to detect early signs of disorders like hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) or vibration-related back issues. Should health effects arise, employers must review controls, provide advice, and consider assigning alternative work. Employers must also inform and train employees about the risks, control measures, exposure values, findings from assessments, and how to spot and report symptoms. Worker consultation is also required, ensuring that those affected are involved in the risk management process.
Failing to comply with these regulations can lead to enforcement action by the Health and Safety Executive, including prosecution. Cases have emerged where organisations have been fined for neglecting to manage vibration risks appropriately.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
Do you take the lead in a circular construction economy?
Help us develop and expand this wiki as a resource for academia and industry alike.
Warm Homes Plan Workforce Taskforce
Risks of undermining UK’s energy transition due to lack of electrotechnical industry representation, says ECA.
Cost Optimal Domestic Electrification CODE
Modelling retrofits only on costs that directly impact the consumer: upfront cost of equipment, energy costs and maintenance costs.
The Warm Homes Plan details released
What's new and what is not, with industry reactions.
Could AI and VR cause an increase the value of heritage?
The Orange book: 2026 Amendment 4 to BS 7671:2018
ECA welcomes IET and BSI content sign off.
How neural technologies could transform the design future
Enhancing legacy parametric engines, offering novel ways to explore solutions and generate geometry.
Key AI related terms to be aware of
With explanations from the UK government and other bodies.
From QS to further education teacher
Applying real world skills with the next generation.
A guide on how children can use LEGO to mirror real engineering processes.
Data infrastructure for next-generation materials science
Research Data Express to automate data processing and create AI-ready datasets for materials research.
Wired for the Future with ECA; powering skills and progress
ECA South Wales Business Day 2025, a day to remember.
AI for the conservation professional
A level of sophistication previously reserved for science fiction.
Biomass harvested in cycles of less than ten years.
An interview with the new CIAT President
Usman Yaqub BSc (Hons) PCIAT MFPWS.
Cost benefit model report of building safety regime in Wales
Proposed policy option costs for design and construction stage of the new building safety regime in Wales.
Do you receive our free biweekly newsletter?
If not you can sign up to receive it in your mailbox here.






















