BSRIA Brexit survey 2018
A Brexit survey conducted in February 2018 among BSRIA members found almost 70% of respondents believe that Brexit has had a negative impact on their business; and that half of those who contributed favour a Swiss model, i.e. a 'soft Brexit'.
When asked if the Brexit negotiations presented members’ businesses with opportunities in the last 18 months – 63% answered 'negatively'; with 37% answering 'no difference'. No member answered 'positively'.
The negative response was due to respective businesses suffering from a lack of market investment; business uncertainty; skills and movement of labour.
Regarding issues which will be of the most importance to the construction industry in the outcome of the UK-EU negotiations, members selected as follows:
- Consistency of regulations.
- Consistency of standards.
- UK influence on regulations.
- UK influence on standards.
- Access to the single market.
When asked if businesses favoured:
- Canada model ('hard Brexit') bilateral trade agreements with the EU.
- Norway model ('soft Brexit') and member of the European Economic Area (EEA) instead of EU.
- Switzerland model ('soft Brexit') and member of European Free Trade Association (EFTA).
Half of BSRIA members responded with the Switzerland model ('soft Brexit'); 31% with the Norway model ('soft Brexit'), and 19% with the Canada model ('hard Brexit').
Clair Prosser, Press Officer, BSRIA, said:
“This survey clearly highlights that BSRIA members do not want to be left stranded and fall off the economic Brexit ‘cliff edge’.
"Business uncertainty and the need for consistency – regulations and standards – are, without a shadow of doubt, anxieties for members. Legislative stability and uniformity is essential. Businesses need to be able to prepare. Balance is needed, this isn’t the time for government to bury its head in the sand. The question needs to be asked: how close will the UK and EU stay on regulation to ensure that industry can trade goods with the minimum of hassle, burdens and bureaucratic hurdles?”
These results mirror the recent Property Week survey, where more than two-thirds said that the vote had negatively affected the property market and a similar number thought the market would continue to be negatively affected when the UK leaves the EU.
This article was originally published here in April 2018 by BSRIA.
--BSRIA
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
70+ experts appointed to public sector fire safety framework
The Fire Safety (FS2) Framework from LHC Procurement.
Project and programme management codes of practice
CIOB publications for built environment professionals.
Sustainable development concepts decade by decade.
The regenerative structural engineer
A call for design that will repair the natural world.
Buildings that mimic the restorative aspects found in nature.
CIAT publishes Principal Designer Competency Framework
For those considering applying for registration as a PD.
BSRIA Building Reg's guidance: The second staircase
An overview focusing on aspects which most affect the building services industry.
Design codes and pattern books
Harmonious proportions and golden sections.
Introducing or next Guest Editor Arun Baybars
Practising architect and design panel review member.
Quick summary by size, shape, test, material, use or bonding.
Types of rapidly renewable content
From forestry to agricultural crops and their by-products.
Terraced houses and the public realm
The discernible difference between the public realm of detached housing and of terraced housing.
Looking back at the influence of climate events
From a designer and writer: 'There are limits to growth but no limits to development'.
Terms, histories, theories and practice.
Biophilic design and natural light
Letting in the light and natural elements into spaces.