BSRIA Brexit survey 2018
A Brexit survey conducted in February 2018 among BSRIA members found almost 70% of respondents believe that Brexit has had a negative impact on their business; and that half of those who contributed favour a Swiss model, i.e. a 'soft Brexit'.
When asked if the Brexit negotiations presented members’ businesses with opportunities in the last 18 months – 63% answered 'negatively'; with 37% answering 'no difference'. No member answered 'positively'.
The negative response was due to respective businesses suffering from a lack of market investment; business uncertainty; skills and movement of labour.
Regarding issues which will be of the most importance to the construction industry in the outcome of the UK-EU negotiations, members selected as follows:
- Consistency of regulations.
- Consistency of standards.
- UK influence on regulations.
- UK influence on standards.
- Access to the single market.
When asked if businesses favoured:
- Canada model ('hard Brexit') bilateral trade agreements with the EU.
- Norway model ('soft Brexit') and member of the European Economic Area (EEA) instead of EU.
- Switzerland model ('soft Brexit') and member of European Free Trade Association (EFTA).
Half of BSRIA members responded with the Switzerland model ('soft Brexit'); 31% with the Norway model ('soft Brexit'), and 19% with the Canada model ('hard Brexit').
Clair Prosser, Press Officer, BSRIA, said:
“This survey clearly highlights that BSRIA members do not want to be left stranded and fall off the economic Brexit ‘cliff edge’.
"Business uncertainty and the need for consistency – regulations and standards – are, without a shadow of doubt, anxieties for members. Legislative stability and uniformity is essential. Businesses need to be able to prepare. Balance is needed, this isn’t the time for government to bury its head in the sand. The question needs to be asked: how close will the UK and EU stay on regulation to ensure that industry can trade goods with the minimum of hassle, burdens and bureaucratic hurdles?”
These results mirror the recent Property Week survey, where more than two-thirds said that the vote had negatively affected the property market and a similar number thought the market would continue to be negatively affected when the UK leaves the EU.
This article was originally published here in April 2018 by BSRIA.
--BSRIA
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Change of use legislation breaths new life into buildings
A run down on Class MA of the General Permitted Development Order.
Solar generation in the historic environment
Success requires understanding each site in detail.
Level 6 Design, Construction and Management BSc
CIOB launches first-ever degree programme to develop the next generation of construction leaders.
Open for business as of April, with its 2026 prospectus and new pipeline of housing schemes.
The operational value of workforce health
Keeping projects moving. Incorporating unplanned absence and the importance of health, in operations.
A carbon case for indigenous slate
UK slate can offer clear embodied carbon advantages.
Costs and insolvencies mount for SMEs, despite growth
Construction sector under insolvency and wage bill pressure in part linked to National Insurance, says report.
The place for vitrified clay pipes in modern infrastructure
Why vitrified clay pipes are reclaiming their role in built projects.
Research by construction PR consultancy LMC published.
Roles and responsibilities of domestic clients
ACA Safety in Construction guide for domestic clients.
Fire door compliance in UK commercial buildings
Architect and manufacturer gives their low down.
The new towns and strategic environmental assessments
12 locations of the New Towns Taskforce reduced to 7 within the new towns draft programme and open consultation.
Buildings that changed the future of architecture. Book review.


















