- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 20 Aug 2019
Vesting certificate for construction goods plant or materials
When specific goods, plant or materials are in high demand, or lead-times are long, it may be necessary to make advance payments to secure an order and prevent delays to the programme, even where the goods, plant or materials remain off-site. Such items should be agreed with the contractor (or sub-contractor or supplier) in advance of executing the contractand listed in an annex to the contract bills.
Paying to secure such items can be useful, however, it does put the client at risk, for example if the contractor becomes insolvent and the items are then not delivered, even though paymenthas been made.
Under such circumstances, a ‘vesting certificate’ or ‘certificate of vesting’ may be required from the contractor (or sub-contractors or suppliers), certifying that ownership of the goods, plant or materials listed in a schedule will transfer from one party to the other upon payment and confirming that they will be will be properly identified, separately stored, insured and are free from encumbrances (such as retention of title).
Vesting certificates can be used as evidence that ownership vests in the client upon payment, defeating third party claims such as claims of retention of title, and can help to identify items, if for example, the contractor becomes insolvent before the items have been delivered to site.
However, the need for and effectiveness of such certificates has been questioned.
Contracts such as the JCT standard building contract and NEC contracts already include provisions requiring the contractor to provide reasonable proof that off-site property is vested in the client, materials are set apart or clearly marked and that they are insured.
Whilst a vesting certificate may be appropriate for use with contracts that do not include such provisions, the status of such certificates relative to other provisions of the main contract may not be clear (ref Olswang, Contractor Vesting Certificates - what legal protection do they provide?).
In addition, it is difficult to sue an insolvent contractor, and despite best endeavours, items may simply be removed or disappear in the event of insolvency, or if there is a rumour that insolvency might occur. This is particularly true for items that have yet to be fabricated, items that have still to be worked on, or items that are abroad.
Other precautions might include:
- Checking the financial status of the contractor to assess the likelihood of insolvency.
- If the contractor is part of a larger group, then a parent company guarantee might be required from the holding company.
- Entering into a direct contract with the supplier.
In a perfect world, items would be delivered to site and affixed to the property before paymentis made, but where this is not possible, a judgement is necessary to assess the risk to the project, against the potential loss to the client.
- Advance payment bond.
- Certificates in the construction industry.
- Lead time.
- Materials on site
- Off-site goods and materials.
- Parent company guarantee.
- Retention of title.
- Site storage.
 External references
Featured articles and news
What future infrastructure provision might look like.
Highlighting the health benefits of home improvement.
Pavilions for music, entertainment, and leisure. Book review.
Broadening our understanding of Dublin’s chequered social history.
The charm of London's Cabmen's shelters.
Future Weather Files research tool looking for feedback.
Exploring the Colour Rendering Index.
Why it's important to find out what went wrong.
ECA reviews the shape of the construction job market.
Why proper room acoustics make a difference.
Initiative puts gas networks on the path to net zero.
WICE Woman Architectural Technologist of the Year 2019.
Traditional low-energy approaches to comfort.
Revisiting the McArthurGlen Designer Outlet in Ashford.
USA In-Use Version 6 is now available.
The rise of architectural barbarism.
In contentious political contexts heritage can be more fractious.