- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 04 Sep 2020
Termination in construction contracts
Most forms of contract will include termination clauses, setting out the circumstances under which a contract may be terminated. When a contract is terminated, the parties to the contract are no longer obliged to perform their obligations under the contract.
Terminating a contract can be complex, and it is very important that the correct procedures are followed. This may involve issuing notices setting out the grounds for termination, allowing warning periods, and giving the opportunity to remedy breaches.
If the one of the parties to a contract fails to perform as required by the contract, this may constitute a breach of contract. If the breach of contract is serious (a material breach), then the innocent party may also consider that it is discharged from any further obligations under the contract.
Where one party behaves in such a way as to indicate that it no longer intends to accept its obligations under the contract, this is considered to be a repudiatory beach (or fundamental breach), allowing the innocent party to terminate the contract and to sue for damages. Generally, the contract will set out what those breaches are, but they might include:
- Refusal to carry out work.
- Abandoning the site.
- Removing plant from the site.
- Failure to make payments.
- Employing others to carry out the work.
- Failure to allow access to the site.
- Failure to proceed regularly and diligently.
- Failure to remove or rectify defective works.
Where repudiation is considered to have occurred, the innocent party can either affirm that the contract will continue, or accept the repudiation and so terminate the contract. In either case, they will have the right to claim damages. Either way, it is important that there is some sort of response, as inaction may be considered to be an affirmation of the contract.
Assessing the seriousness of breaches of contract depends on the particular circumstances and terms of the contract. For example, if a contractor failed to carry out the work to an agreed timetable, this might be considered a relatively minor issue on some projects, whilst on others it could be an extremely serious breach. The innocent party must be careful therefore to establish that there has actually been a material breach before considering that the contract is terminated, otherwise they might find themselves in breach of contract.
This can lead to disputes, where for example, the client refuses to make payment, claiming that the contractor has failed to perform, whereas the contractor contends that they are not performing because the client has refused to make payment.
Frustration occurs when circumstances that are not the fault of either party mean it is impossible to continue with the contract. The contract will come to an end without any party being considered to be in breach. However, parties must be certain that a frustration event has occurred so as not to be in breach of contract.
Force majeure provisions might provide for circumstances that could otherwise be considered frustration events, and so result in termination of the contract. Force majeure (for example, exceptionally adverse weather conditions) is generally considered a relevant event in construction contracts which will allow for an extension of time and a claim for loss and expense rather than termination. This may be in the interests of both parties.
Contracts may allow termination for ‘convenience’. This can be useful for example if the client fails to secure sufficient funding for the project to proceed. However termination for convenience can leave the terminating party open to significant claims by the other party.
Rescission is a process of returning both parties to the position they would have been in had they not entered into a contract. This might be appropriate for example if there is a serious error in the contract.
Contracts may also allow suspension of performance. The circumstances allowing suspension are generally similar to those allowing termination. Suspension can be useful, for example, if the client has difficulty in raising funds to pay for the work to proceed at the speed anticipated by the contract. In addition, the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act gives the right to suspend performance for failure to make payment that has been notified as due.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Alternative dispute resolution.
- Breach of contract.
- Concurrent delay.
- Consequential losses.
- Construction Act.
- Extension of time.
- Force majeure.
- Fair payment practices.
- Housing Forum seeks unity over suspension of works.
- Liquidated damages.
- Loss and expense.
- Suspension of performance.
 External references
Featured articles and news
Creating comfortable climates despite extreme temperatures.
Study examines how adjustable arrangements can succeed.
Government announces plans to improve accessibility.
Resource addresses pandemic-related NEC4 contract issues.
Incorporating EDI into the provision of fair access.
Government announces global innovation strategy.
An architectural biography. Book review.
The house where the future king of France lived.
The teacher, architectural technologist and mum offers her insights.
Careful planning needed as supply chain issues continue.
The sensitive conversion of a neglected Cornwall structure.
Plan stresses local involvement in city, town and village development.