Planning Policy Statement 5 Planning for the Historic Environment
Its publication cancelled:
- Planning Policy Guidance Note 15: Planning and the Historic Environment (PPG15, 1994).
- Planning Policy Guidance Note 16: Archaeology and Planning (PPG16, 1990).
Publication of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) in March 2012 replaced a wide range of previous planning policy statements and planning policy guidance, including PPS5. However, the intent of the NPPF is similar to PPS5 and the guidance related to PPS5 remains relevant.
A guide to Planning Policy Statement 5 (PPS5): Planning for the Historic Environment: Historic Environment Planning Practice Guide was published by Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG) and English Heritage in March 2010. It was replaced in Spring 2015 by guidance prepared by English Heritage (now Historic England) and the Historic Environment Forum. See Historic environment good practice advice for more information.
The guides states that PPS5 ‘…recognises the unique place the historic environment holds in England’s cultural heritage and the multiple ways it supports and contributes to the economy, society and daily life. The PPS also identifies the historic environment as a non-renewable resource. Its fragile and finite nature is a particularly important consideration in planning. Conserving this resource for future generations accords with the principles of sustainable development. Government places a priority on its conservation and has set out tests to ensure that any damage or loss is permitted only where it is properly justified.’
- Recognise that heritage assets are a non-renewable resource.
- Take account of the wider social, cultural, economic and environmental benefits of heritage conservation.
- Recognise that intelligently managed change may sometimes be necessary if heritage assets are to be maintained for the long term.
- Decisions are based on the nature, extent and level of that significance, investigated to a degree proportionate to the importance of the heritage asset.
- Wherever possible, heritage assets are put to an appropriate and viable use that is consistent with their conservation.
- The positive contribution of such heritage assets to local character and sense of place is recognised and valued.
- Consideration of the historic environment is integrated into planning policies, promoting place-shaping.
To contribute to our knowledge and understanding of our past by ensuring that opportunities are taken to capture evidence from the historic environment and to make this publicly available, particularly where a heritage asset is to be lost.
It includes the following policies:
- Policy HE1: Heritage assets and climate change.
- Policy HE2: Evidence base for plan-making.
- Policy HE3: Regional and local planning approaches.
- Policy HE4: Permitted development and article 4 directions.
- Policy HE5: Monitoring indicators.
- Policy HE6: Information requirements for applications for consent affecting heritage assets.
- Policy HE7: Policy principles guiding the determination of applications for consent relating to all heritage assets.
- Policy HE8: Additional policy principle guiding the consideration of applications for consent relating to heritage assets that are not covered by policy HE9.
- Policy HE9: Additional policy principles guiding the consideration of applications for consent relating to designated heritage assets.
- Policy HE10: Additional policy principles guiding the consideration of applications for development affecting the setting of a designated heritage asset.
- Policy HE11: Enabling Development.
- Policy HE12: Policy principles guiding the recording of information related to heritage assets.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Alterations to listed buildings guidance note.
- Archaeological officer.
- Archaeology and construction.
- Article 4 direction.
- Building Preservation Notice.
- Certificate of immunity.
- Conservation area.
- Conservation officer.
- Designated areas.
- Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 and listed buildings.
- Historic England.
- Historic environment good practice advice.
- Listed buildings.
- Permitted development.
- Planning permission.
- Scheduled monuments.
 External references
- Planning Policy Statement 5 (PPS5): Planning for the Historic Environment.
- A guide to Planning Policy Statement 5 (PPS5): Planning for the Historic Environment: Historic Environment Planning Practice Guide.
A chance to nominate retired IHBC members and/or successful learners in heritage skills, with prizes that include £500 and a free place at the IHBC’s Aberdeen 2022 Annual School in June.
Donald Insall Associates has been announced as the winner of the new joint award with the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain (SAHGB). The award celebrates the quality of architectural-historical research produced as private consultants or for public bodies etc.
The IHBC seeks to raise awareness and understanding of how building conservation philosophy and practice contributes towards meeting the challenge of climate change.
From Amenity Societies and Wentworth Woodhouse to Kurt Schwitters, Scotland’s Towns, Chester and more...
The former Royal High School building in Edinburgh is to be transformed into a £55 million national centre for music after the City of Edinburgh Council agreed to the lease of the historic property.
The joint-institute document aims to help maintain cultural heritage by providing a consistent framework across different sectors & geographies
IHBC’s Gus Astley Student Awards 2021: Win £500 and a place on IHBC’s 2022 Aberdeen School with your built environment/heritage coursework, closes 31/07!
The last remaining buildings on the site of the Harris meat factory family’s historic mansion are being restored to their former glory and converted into new homes.
The Construction Industry Coronavirus Forum (CICV Forum) has unveiled a new guide to the crucial and increasingly complex issue of professional indemnity insurance (PII).
ICOMOS has advised that the new football stadium proposal, if implemented, would have a completely unacceptable major adverse impact its authenticity and integrity.