Workplace drug testing methods
Testing for drug use on construction sites and in the workplace is intended to protect people and premises while ensuring that an employer’s responsibilities under the Health and Safety at Work Act have been met. There are several different testing methods, each with their own benefits.
When selecting a testing programme, employers can evaluate the answers to several questions, including:
- Is saliva testing a viable option? In environments where safety and timing are priorities, saliva testing may be preferred, since it can determine if someone is currently under the influence of drugs. Saliva testing can produce a positive result if the individual had taken drugs in the last two hours. Saliva testing is generally not prone to contamination.
- Is urine testing a viable option? While saliva testing may be suitable for some sensitive environments, urine testing may be suitable in instances where random testing policies are in place. This method can provide instant, in-house results that may be able to prevent accidents from happening on site in the first place. However, urine testing may not provide reliable results in instances where very recent substance activity has occurred - or if the test participant is under the influence at the time the sample was taken. Generally, urine tests are unable to detect drugs that have been taken in the 48 hour time period immediately prior to the test.
- What is the test’s cut-off level for each drug? This factor establishes how much of a drug can be present in a person’s system before its presence is detected by the test. If this level is low, the kit will be more sensitive to a positive result.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
Deputy editor of AT, Tim Fraser, discusses the newly formed society with its current chair, Chris Halligan MCIAT.
Barratt Lo-E passivhaus standard homes planned enmasse
With an initial 728 Lo-E homes across two sites and many more planned for the future.
Government urged to uphold Warm Homes commitment
ECA and industry bodies write to Government concerning its 13.2 billion Warm Homes manifesto commitment.
Places of Worship in Britain and Ireland, 1929-1990. Book review.
The emancipation of women in art.
CIOB Construction Manager of the Year 2025
Just one of the winners at the CIOB Awards 2025.
Call for independent National Grenfell oversight mechanism
MHCLG share findings of Building Safety Inquiry in letter to Secretary of State and Minister for Building Safety.
The Architectural Technology Awards
AT Awards now open for this the sixth decade of CIAT.
50th Golden anniversary ECA Edmundson awards
Deadline for submissions Friday 30 May 2025.
The benefits of precast, off-site foundation systems
Top ten benefits of this notable innovation.
Encouraging individuals to take action saving water at home, work, and in their communities.
Takes a community to support mental health and wellbeing
The why of becoming a Mental Health Instructor explained.
Mental health awareness week 13-18 May
The theme is communities, they can provide a sense of belonging, safety, support in hard times, and a sense purpose.
Mental health support on the rise but workers still struggling
CIOB Understanding Mental Health in the Built Environment 2025 shows.
Design and construction material libraries
Material, sample, product or detail libraries a key component of any architectural design practice.
Construction Products Reform Green Paper and Consultation
Still time to respond as consultation closes on 21 May 2025.
Resilient façade systems for smog reduction in Shanghai
A technical approach using computer simulation and analysis of solar radiation, wind patterns, and ventilation.