Workplace drug testing methods
Testing for drug use on construction sites and in the workplace is intended to protect people and premises while ensuring that an employer’s responsibilities under the Health and Safety at Work Act have been met. There are several different testing methods, each with their own benefits.
When selecting a testing programme, employers can evaluate the answers to several questions, including:
- Is saliva testing a viable option? In environments where safety and timing are priorities, saliva testing may be preferred, since it can determine if someone is currently under the influence of drugs. Saliva testing can produce a positive result if the individual had taken drugs in the last two hours. Saliva testing is generally not prone to contamination.
- Is urine testing a viable option? While saliva testing may be suitable for some sensitive environments, urine testing may be suitable in instances where random testing policies are in place. This method can provide instant, in-house results that may be able to prevent accidents from happening on site in the first place. However, urine testing may not provide reliable results in instances where very recent substance activity has occurred - or if the test participant is under the influence at the time the sample was taken. Generally, urine tests are unable to detect drugs that have been taken in the 48 hour time period immediately prior to the test.
- What is the test’s cut-off level for each drug? This factor establishes how much of a drug can be present in a person’s system before its presence is detected by the test. If this level is low, the kit will be more sensitive to a positive result.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
Buildings that changed the future of architecture. Book review.
The Sustainability Pathfinder© Handbook
Built environment agency launches free Pathfinder© tool to help businesses progress sustainability strategies.
Government outcome to the late payment consultation, ECA reacts.
IHBC 2025 Gus Astley Student Award winners
Work on the role of hewing in UK historic conservation a win for Jack Parker of Oxford Brookes University.
Future Homes Building Standards and plug-in solar
Parts F and L amendments, the availability of solar panels and industry responses.
How later living housing can help solve the housing crisis
Unlocking homes, unlocking lives.
Preparing safety case reports for HRBs under the BSA
A new practical guide to preparing structural inputs for safety cases and safety case reports published by IStructE.
Male construction workers and prostate cancer
CIOB and Prostate Cancer UK encourage awareness of prostate cancer risks, and what to do about it.
The changed R&D tax landscape for Architects
Specialist gives a recap on tax changes for Research and Development, via the ACA newsletter.
Structured product data as a competitive advantage
NBS explain why accessible product data that works across digital systems is key.
Welsh retrofit workforce assessment
Welsh Government report confirms Wales faces major electrical skills shortage, warns ECA.
A now architectural practice looks back at its concept project for a sustainable oceanic settlement 25 years on.
Copyright and Artificial Intelligence
Government report and back track on copyright opt out for AI training but no clear preferred alternative as yet.
Embedding AI tools into architectural education
Beyond the render: LMU share how student led research is shaping the future of visualisation workflows.
Why document control still fails UK construction projects
A Chartered Quantity Surveyor explains what needs to change and how.
Inspiration for a new 2026 wave of Irish construction professionals.
New planning reforms and Warm Homes Bill
Take centre stage at UK Construction Week London.