What to expect of sustainability professionals
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
Do infrastructure professionals expect too much, or the wrong thing, from their sustainability colleagues?
Civil engineering and infrastructure are central to sustainability and vice versa. Without infrastructure to meet society’s development, there won’t be any sustainability, whether we’re talking about social, economic or environmental sustainability.
But the infrastructure sector often expects too much, or the wrong thing, from their sustainability colleagues.
Infrastructure professionals all seem to expect that their sustainability colleagues will provide ‘the’ answer to the sustainability issues for each and every project.
In addition, sustainability professionals often act in a way that supports this expectation. This misunderstanding of sustainability is not delivering the innovative solutions we need.
[edit] Great and usually unrealistic expectations
It starts at conferences with sustainability professionals giving presentations that show how they can provide all the answers for everything.
“Here’s our wonderful project in which we started with problems X, Y, and Z, and the sustainability team/professional proposed solutions M, N, and O which all worked perfectly.” Hidden message: sustainability is a great way to solve lots of infrastructure or engineering challenges. This sounds great, doesn’t it?
Unfortunately, no. The unintended consequence of this message is the expectation that ‘the’ (single, best fit) sustainability solution already exists and that it can easily be found just by asking the project’s sustainability professional or sustainability team.
Take a recent example of a major infrastructure project costing a few billion pounds at which ‘the’ sustainability ‘solution’ for the whole project was expected to be explained in a single afternoon workshop to a senior team. How can the sustainability issues possibly be sorted out for such a project in a single workshop and to the senior team only?
This is a significant misunderstanding of sustainability because sustainability requires an almost bespoke response by an individual or a team. The approach to sustainability may be the same across different projects but the solutions are not. If we are to pursue infrastructure excellence then sustainability cannot be delivered in an afternoon workshop.
It requires an ongoing strategic engagement with many different stakeholders and constant dialogue with the teams delivering the project. Presentations of ‘the’ answer by sustainability professionals have the unfortunate effect of compounding the misunderstanding of the collective response at all levels that is needed.
In addition, this single answer misunderstanding of sustainability prevents it from being a powerful force for innovation as well as social, environmental and economic goods. To innovate, sustainability must be allowed to function as a critical friend or mirror on projects.
[edit] What should we expect from sustainability professionals?
On projects, sustainability professionals can provide the right questions and share best practice. Each professional is not an expert in water engineering, geotechnics, structures, planning, contracting, to name just a few disciplines.
Other professionals know their domain far better than sustainability professionals. But by providing the spaces and moments for the experts already working on the project they can facilitate the identification and working through of engineering questions. This different lens enables all the professionals on the project to develop solutions to the sustainability questions.
If we can live and work with the numerous sustainability questions for each project and give up on expecting others to provide the answer we will be able to start providing the sustainability solutions society requires.
This article was originally published here on 14th Nov 2017 by ICE. It was written by Davide Stronati, Chair ICE Sustainability Leadership Team and Global Sustainability Leader, MottMacDonald.
--The Institution of Civil Engineers
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
The 5 elements of seiri, seiton, seiso, seiketsu and shitsuke.
Shading for housing, a design guide
A look back at embedding a new culture of shading.
The Architectural Technology Awards
The AT Awards 2025 are open for entries!
ECA Blueprint for Electrification
The 'mosaic of interconnected challenges' and how to deliver the UK’s Transition to Clean Power.
Grenfell Tower Principal Contractor Award notice
Tower repair and maintenance contractor announced as demolition contractor.
Passivhaus social homes benefit from heat pump service
Sixteen new homes designed and built to achieve Passivhaus constructed in Dumfries & Galloway.
CABE Publishes Results of 2025 Building Control Survey
Concern over lack of understanding of how roles have changed since the introduction of the BSA 2022.
British Architectural Sculpture 1851-1951
A rich heritage of decorative and figurative sculpture. Book review.
A programme to tackle the lack of diversity.
Independent Building Control review panel
Five members of the newly established, Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommended, panel appointed.
Welsh Recharging Electrical Skills Charter progresses
ECA progressing on the ‘asks’ of the Recharging Electrical Skills Charter at the Senedd in Wales.
A brief history from 1890s to 2020s.
CIOB and CORBON combine forces
To elevate professional standards in Nigeria’s construction industry.
Amendment to the GB Energy Bill welcomed by ECA
Move prevents nationally-owned energy company from investing in solar panels produced by modern slavery.
Gregor Harvie argues that AI is state-sanctioned theft of IP.
Experimental AI housing target help for councils
Experimental AI could help councils meet housing targets by digitising records.
BSRIA Occupant Wellbeing survey BOW
Occupant satisfaction and wellbeing tool inc. physical environment, indoor facilities, functionality and accessibility.