What to expect of sustainability professionals
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
Do infrastructure professionals expect too much, or the wrong thing, from their sustainability colleagues?
Civil engineering and infrastructure are central to sustainability and vice versa. Without infrastructure to meet society’s development, there won’t be any sustainability, whether we’re talking about social, economic or environmental sustainability.
But the infrastructure sector often expects too much, or the wrong thing, from their sustainability colleagues.
Infrastructure professionals all seem to expect that their sustainability colleagues will provide ‘the’ answer to the sustainability issues for each and every project.
In addition, sustainability professionals often act in a way that supports this expectation. This misunderstanding of sustainability is not delivering the innovative solutions we need.
[edit] Great and usually unrealistic expectations
It starts at conferences with sustainability professionals giving presentations that show how they can provide all the answers for everything.
“Here’s our wonderful project in which we started with problems X, Y, and Z, and the sustainability team/professional proposed solutions M, N, and O which all worked perfectly.” Hidden message: sustainability is a great way to solve lots of infrastructure or engineering challenges. This sounds great, doesn’t it?
Unfortunately, no. The unintended consequence of this message is the expectation that ‘the’ (single, best fit) sustainability solution already exists and that it can easily be found just by asking the project’s sustainability professional or sustainability team.
Take a recent example of a major infrastructure project costing a few billion pounds at which ‘the’ sustainability ‘solution’ for the whole project was expected to be explained in a single afternoon workshop to a senior team. How can the sustainability issues possibly be sorted out for such a project in a single workshop and to the senior team only?
This is a significant misunderstanding of sustainability because sustainability requires an almost bespoke response by an individual or a team. The approach to sustainability may be the same across different projects but the solutions are not. If we are to pursue infrastructure excellence then sustainability cannot be delivered in an afternoon workshop.
It requires an ongoing strategic engagement with many different stakeholders and constant dialogue with the teams delivering the project. Presentations of ‘the’ answer by sustainability professionals have the unfortunate effect of compounding the misunderstanding of the collective response at all levels that is needed.
In addition, this single answer misunderstanding of sustainability prevents it from being a powerful force for innovation as well as social, environmental and economic goods. To innovate, sustainability must be allowed to function as a critical friend or mirror on projects.
[edit] What should we expect from sustainability professionals?
On projects, sustainability professionals can provide the right questions and share best practice. Each professional is not an expert in water engineering, geotechnics, structures, planning, contracting, to name just a few disciplines.
Other professionals know their domain far better than sustainability professionals. But by providing the spaces and moments for the experts already working on the project they can facilitate the identification and working through of engineering questions. This different lens enables all the professionals on the project to develop solutions to the sustainability questions.
If we can live and work with the numerous sustainability questions for each project and give up on expecting others to provide the answer we will be able to start providing the sustainability solutions society requires.
This article was originally published here on 14th Nov 2017 by ICE. It was written by Davide Stronati, Chair ICE Sustainability Leadership Team and Global Sustainability Leader, MottMacDonald.
--The Institution of Civil Engineers
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
C20 Society; Buildings at Risk List 2025
10 more buildings published with updates on the past decade of buildings featured.
Boiler Upgrade Scheme and certifications consultation
Summary of government consultation, closing 11 June 2025.
Deputy editor of AT, Tim Fraser, discusses the newly formed society with its current chair, Chris Halligan MCIAT.
Barratt Lo-E passivhaus standard homes planned enmasse
With an initial 728 Lo-E homes across two sites and many more planned for the future.
Government urged to uphold Warm Homes commitment
ECA and industry bodies write to Government concerning its 13.2 billion Warm Homes manifesto commitment.
From project managers to rising stars, sustainability pioneers and more.
Places of Worship in Britain and Ireland, 1929-1990. Book review.
The emancipation of women in art.
Call for independent National Grenfell oversight mechanism
MHCLG share findings of Building Safety Inquiry in letter to Secretary of State and Minister for Building Safety.
The Architectural Technology Awards
AT Awards now open for this the sixth decade of CIAT.
50th Golden anniversary ECA Edmundson awards
Deadline for submissions Friday 30 May 2025.
The benefits of precast, off-site foundation systems
Top ten benefits of this notable innovation.
Encouraging individuals to take action saving water at home, work, and in their communities.
Takes a community to support mental health and wellbeing
The why of becoming a Mental Health Instructor explained.
Mental health awareness week 13-18 May
The theme is communities, they can provide a sense of belonging, safety, support in hard times, and a sense purpose.
Mental health support on the rise but workers still struggling
CIOB Understanding Mental Health in the Built Environment 2025 shows.
Design and construction material libraries
Material, sample, product or detail libraries a key component of any architectural design practice.