Vicarious performance
'Vicarious performance' refers to the carrying out of contractual obligations by a person that is not party to a contract, usually by sub-contract or assignment. So, for example, performance by a sub-contractor constitutes vicarious performance on behalf of the main contractor, who remains fully responsible for the work, except where the main contract provides otherwise.
Whether the contractor is allowed to delegate vicarious performance of either all or some of their obligations to a third party will depend on the terms of the contract.
Vicarious performance of the work and whether it is permitted is usually decided based upon whether it either:
- Does not matter who does the work.
- Or, the contract expressly prohibits it.
Where the work is of a non-specialist nature, the right of the contractor to employ a sub-contractor is normally implied.
'British Waggon Co. v Lea' (1880), is often viewed as being the authoritative case. The original contractor contracted to keep railway carriages in repair over a number of years. On liquidation, the benefit and burden of the contract was assigned to British Waggon. Lea could not refuse performance despite the assignment. Cockburn CJ stated:
'All that the hirers, the defendants, cared for in this stipulation was the wagons should be kept in repair; it was indifferent to them by whom the repairs should be done. Thus if, without going into liquidation, or assigning these contracts, the company entered into a contract with a competent party to do the repairs, and so procured them to be done, we cannot think that this would have been a departure from the terms of the contract to keep the wagons in repair.'
The British Waggon ruling may not apply where the contractor has been chosen for its specialist skills, reputation and ability to perform complex operations efficiently.
The contractor's liability for the defaults of the sub-contractor may arise in either tort or in contract.
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Assignment.
- Back-to-back provisions in construction contracts.
- Common law.
- Construction contracts.
- Contractor.
- Contractor vs supplier.
- Domestic sub-contractor.
- Named specialist work.
- Named sub-contractor.
- Nominated sub-contractor.
- Sub-contractor.
[edit] External references
- 'Construction Contract Law: The Essentials', ADRIAANSE, A., Palgrave MacMillan (2005)
Featured articles and news
Grouting refers to the injection of materials into a soil or rock formation to change its physical characteristics.
Part of Designing Buildings Wiki, BREEAM Wiki will advance knowledge sharing for the BRE family of sustainability tools.
Iron, glass and wood underfoot
From the decorative to the utilitarian, and from the photographed to the forgotten.
New BRE book considers the progression from project-based knowledge creation to whole-life urban knowledge management.
This CIOB article explores the concept of value in building design and construction.
BREEAM and Measurabl announce integration to improve the financial performance of commercial real estate.
Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners' release new images of soon-to-open 3WTC tower in New York.
A document can be called a bond or a guarantee. Does the name matter and what is the difference between them?
New briefing note is launched focusing on increasing knowledge of housing that promotes health and wellbeing.
Arbitration is a private, contractual form of dispute resolution used in the construction industry.
The European Parliament has approved a revised Energy Performance of Buildings directive.
One in six MPs supports the ring-fencing of retentions as proposed in the 'Aldous Bill'.