Restoration Stories: patina and paint in old London houses
Restoration Stories: patina and paint in old London houses, Phillipa Stockley, photography Charlie Hopkinson, 2019, 223 pages, Pimpernel Press, hardback.
As the novelist Ralph Ellison phrased it, old houses speak to our ‘lower frequencies’. They resonate with us in ways that can be hard to explain, talk to bits of us of which we were unconscious. Like moths to a pheromone trap, open the door to these houses and you are ensnared.
This book features 16 London houses, mainly 18th and early- 19th century in Spitalfields, where the owners have been happily ensnared. But just as the buildings nurture us, they also need us to nurture them. These are stories of thoughtful and considerate conservation. Stockley, an architectural and interiors journalist, calls the owners ‘modest, conscientious conservationists.’
Of one owner she writes: ‘He has done very little, and that when only absolutely necessary’. Another is allowing 10 years to scrape back the paint layers and yet another owner bemoans the need to put a bathroom in the house at all: ‘nothing ruins a Georgian house like too many bathrooms.’
It is no surprise that many of the houses are inhabited by artistic people: a sculptor, a paint maker, a jeweller, a film-maker and a writer, among others. Perhaps they are more driven by their emotional connection to the building and its aesthetics, and less likely to look at the uncomfortable facts. Many had highs of finding panelling or fireplaces behind plasterboard, or flagstones under concrete and lino. The flip side was finding unsupported beams with rotten ends, holes in the roof or dry rot.
One owner recalls that his basement had been a bomb shelter and was lined with concrete, the windows filled with concrete blocks; another that the boiler belched out carbon monoxide fumes and the cooker was called the Falcon Dominator. But dominating is not what these owners do. These are stories of quietly listening and encouraging the building to be itself; the antithesis of imposed industrial-strength facelifts.
Along with the hob grates, rim locks and hinges that were painstakingly sourced, many of the owners also had to acquire nerves of steel. One owner took on a Spitalfields house thinking there was not much to do, only to find that, actually, there was everything to do. Her husband left in the middle of the project and, with her finances depleted, she wondered how to continue. She recounts a visit from her structural engineer. ‘He said “Once in every 100 years a house needs a decent owner and, fortunately for this house, Oriel, that’s you.” And I thought, oh shit.’ But, reader, she completed the project and lives in the house still.
Many of these houses were saved by the Spitalfields Trust, which began when Dan Cruickshank squatted in a partially demolished house of 1725 to prevent further destruction. The trust has gone on to be hugely successful, having rescued over 70 buildings since 1976 with the motto: ‘Do not be afraid to go where others demur. Saving and finding a new use for an historic building is more important than profit.’
In the 1970s and 80s Cruickshank could be found quietly salvaging bits of panelling, ironmongery and fireplaces from skips, discarded by less sympathetic owners. He stored them safely until a building found a sensitive owner to whom the original fabric was returned. The house that he squatted in is once again a home, and it features in the book.
There is gorgeous photography recording how some owners live in spartan splendour with just a few sticks of furniture, while others furnish their houses as if they were a Blenheim or a Houghton. Chipped paintwork, nail-scarred timber, wobbly glass and worn furniture feature throughout, drawing the reader into the stories. One owner explains being drawn to ‘splits and repairs in panels, and I like teapots with mended handles, or porcelain bowls with staples.’
This atmospheric book shows the virtues of patient and thoughtful conservation. It is one to recommend to anyone who wants their listed building consent now and the project finished tomorrow. It might just open their eyes to a slower form of conservation and the benefits of a light hand.
This article originally appeared as ‘A light hand’ in IHBC's Context 164 (Page 51), published by The Institute of Historic Building Conservation in March 2020. It was written by Kate Judge, architectural historian.
Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
A chance to nominate retired IHBC members and/or successful learners in heritage skills, with prizes that include £500 and a free place at the IHBC’s Aberdeen 2022 Annual School in June.
Donald Insall Associates has been announced as the winner of the new joint award with the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain (SAHGB). The award celebrates the quality of architectural-historical research produced as private consultants or for public bodies etc.
The IHBC seeks to raise awareness and understanding of how building conservation philosophy and practice contributes towards meeting the challenge of climate change.
From Amenity Societies and Wentworth Woodhouse to Kurt Schwitters, Scotland’s Towns, Chester and more...
The former Royal High School building in Edinburgh is to be transformed into a £55 million national centre for music after the City of Edinburgh Council agreed to the lease of the historic property.
The joint-institute document aims to help maintain cultural heritage by providing a consistent framework across different sectors & geographies
IHBC’s Gus Astley Student Awards 2021: Win £500 and a place on IHBC’s 2022 Aberdeen School with your built environment/heritage coursework, closes 31/07!
The last remaining buildings on the site of the Harris meat factory family’s historic mansion are being restored to their former glory and converted into new homes.
The Construction Industry Coronavirus Forum (CICV Forum) has unveiled a new guide to the crucial and increasingly complex issue of professional indemnity insurance (PII).
ICOMOS has advised that the new football stadium proposal, if implemented, would have a completely unacceptable major adverse impact its authenticity and integrity.