- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 07 Nov 2017
Japanese knotweed identification and eradication
What is Japanese knotweed?
Japanese knotweed, the country’s most invasive weed, was imported into the UK around 1820. It grows very quickly and has now spread to every county of the UK. It is causing significant problems for owners and occupiers of affected land, and for developers and contractors on development land.
The plant has an extensive root system that spreads horizontally to great depth. If the root system is not killed or removed in its entirety, it will continue to grow, infesting more land and exacerbating the problems it causes.
How is Japanese knotweed identified?
Early identification of the plant is essential to prevent disturbance of ground within infested areas. Ground disturbance results in rapid spread of knotweed to other areas on or off site, which has significant legal ramifications.
Japanese knotweed is usually fairly distinctive as it is a tall (2-3m high) plant. However, being perennial it appearance changes with the seasons, starting with new shoots in spring, growing to its full height by July. It flowers in August or September before dying back in November leaving brittle leafless canes in winter, making it more difficult to identify.
The appearance of the plant can be substantially altered by application of certain herbicides, making the identification of Japanese knotweed more difficult to the untrained eye. Where these have not been completely effective the knotweed re-growth returns with stunted plants, not exceeding waist height, with small leaves and spindly stems.
Accurate identification is essential. Some contractor companies offer a free identification service if you email them an image.
The images here show:
- The stems and new leaves - these appear in spring
- Japanese knotweed in flower in the summer.
- The leaves turning brown in the autumn.
- Dead canes in winter.
Developing a site with Japanese knotweed
If a developer has a site infested with knotweed, then complete eradication of the knotweed should be the goal. This is not easy, but tried and tested methods do exist, and when undertaken correctly can provide the desired result. However, developers should be wary, there are many pitfalls. The old adage ‘you get what you pay for’ applies to the knotweed eradication market.
If a developer causes knotweed to be spread off site, they could find themselves at the wrong end of criminal proceedings under either the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, or the Environmental Protection Act 1990 ‘duty of care’. Offences under these Acts, whether intentional or not, can result in significant fines and, in extreme cases, custodial sentences.
A number of eradication methods exist which suit different circumstances and which involve differing costs and levels of effectiveness.
If the ground is not going to be disturbed (which is rarely the case on a development site) and some limited regrowth is tolerable, then herbicide treatment will be the most cost effective method.
Herbicide treatment is typically applied either as a foliar spray or by stem injection. There is concern within the Japanese knotweed eradication industry regarding the effectiveness of stem injection as an eradication technique. Discussion has centred on whether stem injection simply kills the above ground part of the plant, leaving the rhizome system alive but in a state of temporary dormancy.
However, application by foliar spray is tried and tested, and if done correctly can kill knotweed.
If the ground within an area of knotweed-infested land is likely to be disturbed, then herbicide treatment alone is unlikely to be sufficient and a physical removal method will be preferable.
Dormancy and the risk of accidental contamination
Japanese knotweed has a particular characteristic known in the industry as ‘dormancy’ - the plant can be shocked into a state of temporary dormancy by herbicide application. It may look as if the problem has been resolved at the surface, when in fact viable root rhizome remains in the ground, ready to resurface when the conditions are favourable to the plant.
As Japanese knotweed roots can easily be at least 2 m deep, and as the rhizomes spread laterally into areas which may appear unaffected, the risk is clear. In these circumstances a contractor may then accidentally disturb hidden rhizomes and fragment and spread them to other areas of the site, and possibly off site. This would significantly increase the scale of the problem, the cost of remediation and would be a breach environmental legislation.
Historically, ‘dig and dump’ was seen as the solution, where all infested soil was excavated, loaded into large lorries and taken to landfill. This is extremely costly, both to the client’s budget and the environment. Better and less expensive solutions are now used.
A new method has been developed whereby the excavated soils are processed on site using purpose-designed and patented technology to separate and remove the knotweed rhizome from the soil. The offending rhizome is removed from site, and the processed soil re-used on site, to give zero waste to landfill.
On larger development sites, there may be adequate space to excavate the infested soils from construction-critical areas, and stockpile the material on site for subsequent herbicide treatment over one or more growing seasons. This method can be cost effective but does require considerable space for the stockpile, so is often not feasible.
On-site burial is a method referred to in the Environment Agency Knotweed Code of Practice, whereby the infested soils are buried at depth within a membrane-lined cell. This method does contain the knotweed but should not be considered as an eradication technique, due to the fact that knotweed rhizome remains untreated on site; a rhizome which can lie dormant for up to twenty years.
It's important to ensure the knotweed company selected has the skills, experience and resources to completely eradicate the knotweed, as well as the financial stability to be able to honour any guarantees they may offer. It is advisable to check their credentials, their financial security and their trading record.
This article was created by --Nicolas Seal 14:21, 25 September 2012 (BST)
Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Deleterious materials.
- Dry rot fungus.
- Environmental legislation.
- Ecological survey.
- Pre-purchase Japanese knotweed risk report.
- Protected species.
- Tree preservation order.
- Tree rights.
- Wildlife and Countryside Act.
- The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.
- The Environmental Protection Act 1990.
- DEFRA, Japanese knotweed, giant hogweed and other invasive plants.
- Environment Agency Knotweed Code of Practice.
- Japanese Knotweed. Recognising knotweed.
- Garden Buildings Direct. The Definitive Guide to Japanese Knotweed (2017 edition).
Featured articles and news
A PQP describes the activities, standards, tools and processes necessary to achieve quality in a project's delivery.
How Lidl has been actively working to reinforce their brand through sustainability.
Association of British Insurers describe full-scale cladding tests as 'utterly inadequate'.
This article examines the changing policy commitments and evolving definitions of the zero carbon home.
Researchers believe they may have created a 'game-changing' new form of concrete using graphene.
Grouting refers to the injection of materials into a soil or rock formation to change its physical characteristics.
Part of Designing Buildings Wiki, BREEAM Wiki will advance knowledge sharing for the BRE family of sustainability tools.
From the decorative to the utilitarian, and from the photographed to the forgotten.
New BRE book considers the progression from project-based knowledge creation to whole-life urban knowledge management.
This CIOB article explores the concept of value in building design and construction.
Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners' release new images of soon-to-open 3WTC tower in New York.
A document can be called a bond or a guarantee. Does the name matter and what is the difference between them?