Trees have often been the cause of disputes between neighbours. A summary of some of the rights and remedies relating to trees is presented below.
 Branches and roots
- The owner of a property has the right to lop off any branches that overhang their property. They do not have the right to take preventive action by cutting back a neighbour’s tree before it overhangs their property. Any lopped branches must be returned to the neighbour.
- Fruit on overhanging branches belongs to the person who owns the tree and strictly speaking in law should be returned to the owner.
- The same legal right in respect of overhanging branches is applicable to tree roots on a neighbour's land.
- In the case of a dispute, the Access to Neighbouring Land Act allows a party to apply to the courts for consent to access neighbouring property to carry out essential maintenance.
- There is no right to a view (although it is possible that a restrictive covenant against ‘annoyance’ can be used to protect a view) although there can be a prescriptive right to light (the right to receive sufficient light through an opening such as a window, to allow ordinary comfortable use and enjoyment of a dwelling, or ordinary beneficial use and occupation of other buildings), see: Right to light for more information.
- There is no right to top a neighbour’s trees or hedges other than any elements that overhang neighbouring property.
NB Some trees are protected by tree preservation orders (TPO's). The principal effect of a TPO is to prohibit the cutting down, uprooting, topping, lopping, uprooting, willful damage to or willful destruction of protected trees or woodlands. This applies to roots as well as stems and branches. The local authority should keep a register of TPO's. See Tree preservation orders for more information.
- Mature trees take up 4,000 litres of groundwater a day in the summer, and tree roots can spread out to a distance equal to the height of the tree. Consequently a situation can occur where neighbouring buildings suffer subsidence. A house owner can bring a successful court action against a neighbour if the cause of the subsidence can be proven to be caused by a neighbour's tree.
 Public rights of way
- The owner of land that is designated a public footpath or bridleway has a legal responsibility to keep the full access clear of trees, shrubs and obstructive vegetation.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Chain of custody.
- Conservation area.
- Definition of tree for planning purposes.
- Forest ownership.
- Green belt.
- Ground heave.
- Listed buildings.
- Permission for felling or lopping a tree.
- Restrictive covenants.
- Right to light.
- Rights of way.
- Sites of Special Scientific Interest.
- Tree dripline.
- Tree preservation orders.
- Tree root subsidence.
- Trees in conservation areas.
 External references
- Access to Neighbouring Land Act.
- Practical Law: Restrictive covenant - interference with view?
Featured articles and news
What is the Home Quality Mark? Find out how it can help you when buying/renting a new home.
Business Secretary launches £246m Faraday Challenge to establish UK as world leader in battery technology.
Government announces new plans for regulations to improve safety and security awareness of drone users.
Read our introductory article to the various different types of fuel.
IHBC book review: Charles Barry’s monumental struggle to rebuild the Houses of Parliament.
Read about RSHP's British Museum extension which has been shortlisted for the 2017 Stirling Prize.
Read our introductory article to building a house extension.
More updates from DCMS about the large-scale testing of cladding systems and the number of buildings affected.
UandI secure resolution to grant planning consent for major new regeneration project.
IHBC article considers how heritage is dealt with when infrastructure schemes are authorised.
It was the tallest structure in the world for 3,800 years, but to this day the exact construction techniques are a mystery.
Shortlist for the industry's most coveted award announced.
Government responds to Mark Farmer's review of industry, rejecting the call for a levy on clients.