- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 07 Feb 2018
Giving professional advice to friends - a case study
Paul Greenwood MCIAT reflects on a situation that happened between friends.
Let’s imagine a Saturday night out between friends Nora (a consumer) and Alan (who is a Chartered Architectural Technologist). They are both good friends and Nora mentions to Alan about a two-storey extension she is thinking of adding to her country retreat.
Alan is very experienced in extensions of this type and assured her there would be no problem with obtaining planning permission and passing Building Regulations. He would also be able to obtain both these approvals in good time to start building in the spring so that it would be finished twelve weeks later when her parents were due to move out of their extortionately expensive penthouse in the Lake District.
Very helpfully, Alan gave a budget cost for Nora to work to so she could raise the necessary finance (about £50,000). Like a true friend, he wasn’t going make a charge for his design. He could do this sort of work in his sleep so it was no big deal.
Alan duly prepared his drawings and submitted them for planning... and you’ve guessed it — planning was refused. It was, however, approved on appeal some nine months later. The Building Regulations application didn’t fare much better. The ground was an old dye works which was contaminated and needing remediation. If that was not bad enough, the ground was filled and needed piling.
Alan engaged the necessary specialists to resolve the issues of remediation and produced the design for the piling, etc. Not surprisingly he sent Nora the bills he received, politely explained what had happened and asked her to pay these. He also sent a bill of his own (very modest indeed in the circumstances), and asked her if she would pay this as well because the work he had undertaken was well beyond what he had expected to do free-of-charge. They were good friends and he knew she would understand.
Well let’s have a look at the hole he has dug for himself.
Firstly, it’s worth considering the case of ‘Mr and Mrs Burgess v Mrs Lejonvarn’.
In 2012, Mr and Mrs Burgess decided to landscape their garden and got a quote from a landscaper of £200,000. It was too high so they consulted their friend and former neighbour Mrs Lejonvarn, a Netherlands-registered architect living in London.
Mrs Lejonvarn considered the work could be done on a much smaller budget and proceeded to provide design and project management services; there was no formal contract. She did not ask for payment but it was her intention to charge a fee for detailed design work at a later stage.
As Mrs Lejonvarn’s work progressed, the Burgesses became concerned about the quality and cost of the work. The relationship between them deteriorated to the point the Burgesses engaged the original landscaper to finish off the works at a significant cost. The Burgesses sued Mrs Lejonvarn and the court held that a professional person did owe a duty of care when performing gratuitous services.
Can you see what is likely to happen to Alan in relation to the poor advice he gave Nora about the cost of the project and the time to construct it? I don’t think he stands much chance of recovering the money he has paid out to other consultants, nor the modest fee he charged. Who is going to have to pay for the extra rent on the penthouse in the Lakes? (Alan knew about this and made provisions for damages in the building contract).
You might think you wouldn’t fall into that trap. Well that’s a relief, but are you aware of the Consumer Rights Act 2015?
Do you remember all these rash ‘promises’ that planning and Building Regulations were no problem and the extension would only cost about £50,000. Well, with all the ground remediation and piling and the cost of delay (did I not mention work started before planning was approved and Building Regulations was under a Building Notice — well it was straight forward wasn’t it!), the final cost came in nearly ten times the original estimate!
‘Every contract to supply a service is to be treated as including as a term of the contract anything that is said or written to the consumer, by or on behalf of the trader, about the trader or the service, if—
(a) it is taken into account by the consumer when deciding to enter into the contract, or
I am sure you can see that Alan is likely to be in serious difficulty and is likely to be on the wrong end of a claim for the increased costs running to about £500,000 if Nora relied on Alan (as she did) in going ahead with the project based on an estimated cost of £50,000.
You might think you wouldn’t fall into that trap either. Well that’s a relief too. You all are aware of the cancellation provisions in the Consumer Rights Act 2015…
If your contract is one which requires you to set out the cancellation rights of the consumer (which is one of the contracts that a Technologist is likely to enter into for residential work), and you don’t set out the cancellation rights (and Alan didn’t), then you (and Alan) are in for a big surprise. The Act states:
(2) If the trader provides the consumer with that information in the period of 12 months beginning with the first day of the 14 days mentioned in regulation 30(2) to (6), but otherwise in accordance with Part 2, the cancellation period ends at the end of 14 days after the consumer receives the information.
(3) Otherwise the cancellation period ends at the end of 12 months after the day on which it would have ended under regulation 30. [Regulation 30 states a 14 day cancellation period]’
The effect of the above provision is to extend the cancellation period up to 12 months and 14 days if the cancellation rights have not been provided to the consumer!
Let’s go back to Alan who is pretty fed up with how things have gone, to put it mildly. Well, at least he can bill for his inspections that he carried out, which he did. On his mat lands a letter from Nora (which arrived twelve months and thirteen days after they met in the pub), stating she was cancelling her contract with Alan with immediate effect.
The consequence of the above provision means that Nora could cancel her contract at such a late stage — even after Alan had done chargeable work. The contract Alan thought he had now never existed and as a result there was no entitlement to be paid any of the fees that had been agreed.
Alan learnt three very valuable lessons. I doubt if he will do that again. It was a very expensive lesson!
This article was originally published in AT Journal Spring 2017 edition.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
RSHP's Merano wins RIBA accolade.
How to differentiate between partial possession and early use.
Ofwat proposes £12 billion additional investment and £50 bill reductions.
Avoiding 'winner's curse' and other useful info.
Developing test methods for video flame/smoke detectors
Waiting for a new deal ...but will funding materialise?
Our servers have reached another milestone. Why not write an article and be seen by our 6.5 million users.
RSHP celebrates competition win in Paris.
All about approved inspectors.
Whilst apparently confusing, German conservation is actually not that different.
The rise and fall of council housing. Book review.
Drivers of change in global heating markets.