Fee for intervention FFI
In 2012, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) introduced a fee for intervention (FFI) scheme which allows them to charge companies where safety breaches are found. If the HSE undertakes inspections and no material breaches are found, or the company is compliant, no charges are made.
An independent review of the fee for intervention scheme was undertaken in 2013 which found that its application had been successful and there was no ‘viable alternative’ which could meet the aim of shifting the cost of regulating work place health and safety away from the taxpayer to those who break the law.
It is only necessary for a charge to be levied on a company when a material breach is found. This is considered to be where there has been a contravention of health and safety law that requires a notice in writing to be issued.
- Self-employed individuals who may put others at risk.
- Individuals acting in a capacity other than as an employee, such as partners.
- Public and limited companies.
- Crown and public bodies.
- General, limited and limited liability parternships.
A material breach of the law is charged at £124 per hour and the total number of hours charged is based on the time it takes to identify the breach and remedy it.
Detailed guidance is provided in the HSE booklet ‘Guidance on the application of Fee for Intervention’.
In October 2015 it was reported that invoices issued to construction companies under the scheme for costs recovery had increased by 40% in the three years since it was introduced. See 40% increase in HSE cost recovery invoices for more information.
In January 2017 it was revealed that fees had reached £15m in 2016, up 23% on the year before.
Also in January 2017, it was reported that the nature of the scheme would be questioned at a judicial review brought by facilities management firm OCS. This is seen as an attempt to have the fees bill overturned and the system for deciding appeals quashed.
In February 2017, proposals were put forward for an impartial body to rule on disputes over fees. An HSE spokesperson said; “HSE has always kept the dispute process under review and following a recent application for a judicial review we believe the time is right to move to a dispute process which is completely independent of HSE.”
In March 2017, it was reported that changes would include; a right for dutyholders to obtain evidence used by HSE; an independent appeals panel and a right to make submissions to the appeals panel. The changes must be in place by 1 September 2017 to avoid further court action.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- CDM Regulations.
- Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences definitive guideline.
- Deleterious materials.
- HSE land use planning pre-application advice service.
- Health and safety.
- Health and safety inspector.
- Notify HSE.
- Reporting accidents and injuries on construction sites.
- Statutory consultee.
 External references
Featured articles and news
Sir Oliver Letwin to lead an independent review into the delays in the delivery of housing.
As Carillion collapses, read our article explaining insolvency in the construction industry.
43,000 jobs at risk as Carillion goes into administration.
1961 saw the publication of three important books about urban design that remain relevant today.
Next week the planning fee increases by 20% and new fees are introduced.
How the transformative power of BIM and other digital technologies can be used to gain a competitive edge.
Relevant events and relevant matters are terms used in some contracts, but knowing the differences is important.
Government release statistics showing how many people are now on the property ladder due to Help to Buy schemes.
A summary of the Town and Country Planning Association's new Practical Guide on health in garden cities.
We have launched a new adaptive site that makes Designing Buildings Wiki easier to use on tablets and mobile phones.
ICE President highlights the construction sector deal's potential to boost the UK's economy and productivity.