Co-heating test
There is significant evidence to suggest that buildings do not perform as well when they are completed as was anticipated when they were being designed. The difference between anticipated and actual performance is known as the performance gap.
The co-heating test is used to measure the amount of heat lost through the thermal envelope of completed buildings. It provides an assessment of the as-built performance of whole buildings, that is, their heat loss coefficient (HLC). It is calculated by comparing the heat input into a building against the disparity between temperatures inside and outside the building.
The test measures the heat that is lost through the elements of the building fabric such as walls, floor, roof, doors, windows, and so on. Comparing this to the heat loss that was expected during the design process (such as heat loss calculated for the Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP)) can identify problems and help improve the design of buildings in the future.
The test is carried out after the completion of a new-build or refurbishment project, but before it is occupied. It involves heating the building to a constant internal temperature, usually 25°C, over a period of time, typically 1 to 3 weeks. This constant temperature is achieved by using fan-assisted convector heaters with further fan assistance to ensure good air mixing so that there is an even temperature throughout the building. An integral and differential controller linked to temperature sensors is used to maintain the temperature to ±0.2°C.
During the test the building should remain unoccupied and any equipment that may use or generate energy should be switched off. Plotting the daily heat input against the daily difference in temperature between interior and exterior, indicates the heat loss coefficient as a static value in W/K.
For optimum testing, with an internal temperature of 25°C, there should be a temperature difference of at least 10°C between the interior and exterior, which is why tests tend to be carried out over winter months between October and April. This also helps mitigate against the impact of solar gain which requires a correction to be applied.
Co-heating testing may be beneficial where buildings are representative of standard types to be replicated on a larger scale with improvements made in response to the test's findings, or where different construction or contracting methods need to be compared.
The testing may not be suitable where buildings have not been able to dry out for several months before testing, where buildings are apartments or multi-use, or where buildings are bespoke designs that are not going to be replicated.
There has been some criticism of the test as it requires that buildings are undisturbed and unoccupied for a long period of time, and because of the potential impact of external weather conditions and in particular solar radiation on the results.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Building heating systems.
- Building performance evaluation.
- Building performance metrics.
- Cold bridge.
- Heat transfer.
- Performance gap.
- Radiant heating.
- Standard assessment procedure.
- Thermal comfort.
- U value.
[edit] External references
- BPE Guide - Co-heating tests
- Open Energy Monitor - Measuring thermal performance
Featured articles and news
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from constructuon and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.
The increasing costs of repair and remediation
Highlighted by regulator of social housing, as acceleration plan continues.
Free topic guide on mould in buildings
The new TG 26/2024 published by BSRIA.
Greater control for LAs over private rental selective licensing
A brief explanation of changes with the NRLA response.
Practice costs for architectural technologists
Salary standards and working out what you’re worth.
The Health and Safety Executive at 50
And over 200 years of Operational Safety and Health.
Thermal imaging surveys a brief intro
Thermal Imaging of Buildings; a pocket guide BG 72/2017.