Caveat emptor in property sales
The phrase ‘caveat emptor’ (or ‘buyer beware’) refers to the general principle that the seller of an item will generally know more about it than the purchaser and so the purchaser must take care to check the item before agreeing a price and purchasing it.
Whilst legislation such as the Sale of Goods Act and the Unfair Contract Terms Act provide some protection to consumers, allowing them to return goods that are not of an acceptable standard, it does not apply to the sale of property (although it may apply to new goods in a property).
The purchaser of property must take care to satisfy themselves that there are no unacceptable defects in the quality, fitness, or title of that property, as they may have no remedy against the seller if it turns out that there are defects. As a result, buyers will tend to investigate the title to a property they are considering purchasing, commission surveys and carry out searches to satisfy themselves that the property is acceptable.
Whilst the seller of property cannot make untrue statements or representations, they are under no obligation to disclose material facts to the purchaser. The only exception to this is if the seller is aware of latent defects in title or issues relating to the property, which the purchaser could not reasonably discover by inspection, then the seller must disclose those defects to the purchaser. Failure to do so can entitle the buyer to claim damages or to rescind the contract.
As it can be difficult to determine whether a defect is ‘obvious’ and so does not need to be disclosed, sellers may adopt a cautionary approach, however this can affect the price or the progress of the sale.
This combination of failure to disclose and misrepresentation can produce complicated situations. For example, a seller may not be obliged to disclose the extent of the title of a property, as this should be reasonably discoverable by the purchaser. However, if the property details falsely indicate the extent of the title then this may amount to misrepresentation.
The situation is complicated further by the existence of guarantees (which should be transferrable, but are only as good as the company that gave them), collateral warranties and third party rights which may give additional rights to the purchaser.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Collateral warranty.
- Construction contract.
- Latent defects.
- Rights of third parties.
- Technical due diligence.
- Vendor survey.
 External references
- Scotland.gov Caveat emptor.
Featured articles and news
What is liquidation and how does it apply to contractors in the construction industry?
Scrutiny is placed on Carillion's controversial 2013 decision to extend subcontractor payment terms to 120 days.
RSHP unveil their involvement in a boundary crossing which will provide a new entry point into Hong Kong.
With PFI currently under the spotlight due to Carillion, this introductory article explains what they are.
Estimates suggest that up to 30,000 small firms could be at risk of non-payment as a result of Carillion's collapse.
Sir Oliver Letwin to lead an independent review into the delays in the delivery of housing.
As Carillion collapses, read our article explaining insolvency in the construction industry.
43,000 jobs at risk as Carillion declares insolvency..
1961 saw the publication of three important books about urban design that remain relevant today.
Next week the planning fee increases by 20% and new fees are introduced.
How the transformative power of BIM and other digital technologies can be used to gain a competitive edge.