Boom Cities: architect-planners and the politics of urban renewal in 1960s Britain
|Boom Cities: architect-planners and the politics of urban renewal in 1960s Britain, Otto Saumarez Smith, Oxford University Press, 2019, 198 pages, 31 black & white illustrations.|
Otto Saumarez Smith, an assistant professor at the University of Warwick, recognises himself ‘as part of a generation born after the glory days of the welfare state which looks back on the physical remains of this vanished era with nostalgia for a lost idealism’. Boom Cities deals with a subject that has received an overwhelmingly negative press: the redevelopment of city centres in the 1960s, from the more balanced and nuanced perspective of a young scholar who was not there at the time.
Saumarez Smith identifies 1963 (the year of publication of Traffic in Towns, Wilfred Burns’ plan for Newcastle and Peter Hall’s vision of the London region in 2000) as a high point of city-centre redevelopment. It was a period of economic prosperity, optimism and an assumption that motor traffic could grow almost without limit. These were views shared across the political parties. Consultancies and local authorities employed the dual-qualified architect-planners who would reshape cities to reflect the 60s zeitgeist. Konrad Smigielski’s 1964 Leicester Traffic Plan rode this wave of positive energy. The plan, like Smigielski’s work in general, had much in it that was good, including an emphasis on public transport. But, with elements like a monorail system, it proved over-ambitious.
Blackburn’s was one of the earliest and most radical redevelopment schemes, promoted by a public private partnership. It covered six hectares of the city centre, separating traffic and pedestrians. The result was praised at the time by critics such as Ian Nairn, and Saumarez Smith finds Blackburn still worthy of respect. Graeme Shankland’s plans for Liverpool and Bolton followed; his unbuilt plan for Hook new town provided a model. The excitement generated by Shankland’s radical plan for Liverpool was not followed through and left large areas of dereliction. The plan for Bolton was more successful. The aristocratic Lionel Brett had a more incremental approach than Shankland in his plans for Hatfield new town and Portsmouth, and in his 1966 conservation study for York. By 1970 Brett had moved to advocating a restrained approach to redevelopment before his career took off in a different direction.
Tracing the overall trajectory of city-centre redevelopment, Saumarez Smith quotes Richard Crossman, minister in the 1964 Labour government, admiring the rigorous geometry of Cumbernauld while privately suspecting that most people would prefer the kind of living environment offered by Welwyn Garden City. Crossman was also concerned about the contrast between ambitious drawings and poor quality in the corresponding built schemes. Saumarez Smith identifies a mismatch between schemes designed on the basis of an assumption of future affluence and the reality of cities like Stoke-on-Trent which were moving towards a post-industrial state. He ends the book with a useful plea for a holistic view of the post-1945 legacy, including ‘the shopping centre, the roads and the underpasses’. The story, he concludes, has ‘its share of both idealism and crassness’ and ‘doesn’t fit neatly into a polemic’.
Older readers may find that the author’s portrayal of ‘architect-planners’ as urban power brokers does not quite ring true: in the reviewer’s memory these professionals were sometimes ruminative types who developed an interest in the then niche field of conservation. Academic publishing is clearly challenging but it is a pity that the price of the book may deter many who would find Boom Cities interesting and enjoyable. This is a brilliantly researched and very readable book.
This article originally appeared as ‘Redevelopers and ruminants’ in IHBC's Context 161 (Page 61), published by The Institute of Historic Building Conservation in September 2019. It was written by Michael Taylor, editorial coordinator for Context.
Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Adam Curtis - The Great British Housing Disaster.
- Ballymun mass housing and regeneration.
- British post-war mass housing.
- Garden cities.
- Housing contribution to regeneration.
- IHBC articles.
- Municipal Dreams: the rise and fall of council housing.
- New Town Development Corporation.
- New towns.
- The Institute of Historic Building Conservation.
The Construction Industry Council’s (CIC’s) ‘CIC Coronavirus Digest – Issue 8’ surveys the latest government advice with updates from the construction industry.
Organisations with conservation links have been collating resources on COVID-19 impacts, including Built Environment Forum Scotland (BEFS), Historic Environment Forum, The Heritage Alliance (THA), and Historic England, on cleaning surfaces.
Councils are reported to be considering taking up rarely-used executive powers to keep the planning and development system moving during the coronavirus pandemic.
Historic England's 'After a Flood' provides timely advice on how to dry walls properly and avoid further damage to the building fabric.
Context Issue 162 offers a peek into an archive of timber conservation history through the records of the practice of FWB and Mary Charles Chartered Architects.
To meet the government’s target of being carbon neutral by 2050, we must recycle, reuse and responsibly adapt our existing historic buildings, according to this year’s Heritage Counts report, so Historic England and partners are calling for a reduction in VAT rates to incentivise this more sustainable option.
Donald Insall Associates, with the help of Historic England, has completed restoration work of Moseley Road Baths, being converted for use as an arts and culture venue.
Celebrate your local ‘retired members’ and ‘successful learners’ with £500 cash prizes and 2020 Brighton School places!
The Conservation Hierarchy is a new framework developed by the University of Oxford to help construction projects achieve Biodiversity Net Gain.
Jacqueline Hughes, senior risk analyst at Equib, in pbctoday discusses how project managers for town centre developments can get their risk management strategies right.
A new paper from the Adam Smith Institute argues that the problem with the High Street has been totally misunderstood, saying that we need to reform restrictive planning rules and reject a policy of managed decline to reinvigorate our town centres.
The Whole Life Cost of Energy (WLCoE) calculator – issued by government in BETA form – is intended to help building owners and operators to understand the full financial cost of the energy their buildings use, and welcomes feedback.