Time and material contract (T&M)
In the United States, a time and material contract (T&M) is a type of construction contract that commits the client to pay the contractor based upon the time spent on the works, the materials used, as well as a mark-up for profit. In the UK, this type of contract is known as a cost reimbursable contract or cost plus.
This differs from a fixed price contract which commits the client to pay the contractor a lump sum fee for fulfilling the contract regardless of the amount on labour, materials, and so on used. A T&M contract is typically used on projects where it is difficult to describe the extent of the works required accurately, or where specifications and requirements are likely to change as the project progresses.
The main items that can be included in a T&M contract are:
- Labour rates: The amount that will be charged for the workforce, which may also include insurance, taxes, and so on.
- Material mark-up: It is usual for the client to be charged the retail price for materials and for a mark-up to be added by the contractor if they have a pre-agreed wholesale price with the supplier.
- Not-to-exceed: A guaranteed maximum price which places an upper limit on what the client can be charged by the contractor.
The advantages of using a T&M contract include:
- It provides the client with cost transparency and allows them to verify invoices and timesheets to ensure the costs are correct.
- It allows for greater flexibility in the extent of the works required.
- It allows works to progress even when there is no definitive plan for how it will be completed.
- It saves time in the initial estimating process which otherwise has to be done to a much higher level of detail and accuracy.
- Although there is generally a limit on their profit, the contractor can proceed knowing they are going to recover expenses with some profit, and so they can avoiding cost-cutting.
The disadvantages of using a T&M contract include:
- It can prove more risky for the client to proceed without a clear understanding of the final cost.
- It can increase the likelihood of disputes arising.
- Errors or inaccurate estimates can leave them with a low profit that may not be deemed worthwhile.
- It can necessitate more involvement from the client to ensure the contractor is motivated to progressing the works on time and within budget.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Professional practical experience for Architects in training
The long process to transform the nature of education and professional practical experience in the Architecture profession following recent reports.
A people-first approach to retrofit
Moving away from the destructive paradigm of fabric-first.
International Electrician Day, 10 June 2025
Celebrating the role of electrical engineers from André-Marie Amperè, today and for the future.
New guide for clients launched at Houses of Parliament
'There has never been a more important time for clients to step up and ...ask the right questions'
The impact of recycled slate tiles
Innovation across the decades.
EPC changes for existing buildings
Changes and their context as the new RdSAP methodology comes into use from 15 June.
Skills England publishes Sector skills needs assessments
Priority areas relating to the built environment highlighted and described in brief.
BSRIA HVAC Market Watch - May 2025 Edition
Heat Pump Market Outlook: Policy, Performance & Refrigerant Trends for 2025–2028.
Committing to EDI in construction with CIOB
Built Environment professional bodies deepen commitment to EDI with two new signatories: CIAT and CICES.
Government Grenfell progress report at a glance
Line by line recomendation overview, with links to more details.
An engaging and lively review of his professional life.
Sustainable heating for listed buildings
A problem that needs to be approached intelligently.
50th Golden anniversary ECA Edmundson apprentice award
Deadline for entries has been extended to Friday 27 June, so don't miss out!
CIAT at the London Festival of Architecture
Designing for Everyone: Breaking Barriers in Inclusive Architecture.
Mixed reactions to apprenticeship and skills reform 2025
A 'welcome shift' for some and a 'backwards step' for others.