- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 09 Jul 2014
State of the construction industry in Uganda
Uganda is a low income developing country located in Sub-Saharan Africa, with a population of 36.35 million, a GDP of US$19.88 Billion growing at a rate of 3.4%, against an inflation of 14% (World Bank, 2003). With a GNI per capita based on the Atlas method of US$440, Uganda remains a very poor country and far from the middle income status it aspires to achieve in one generation, and in order to achieve higher development outcomes, the transformation of its economy will be hinged on how the country manages its resources, in particular the fast-growing and youthful population, as well as the recently discovered oil (ibid). The construction industry contributes over 12% of Uganda’s gross domestic product (GDP) and has witnessed steady growth for the last 20 years and despite the recent upsurge in inflation, the sector has remained on a steady path of growth and development (Uganda National Commission for UNESCO, 2013).
The management of the construction industry in Uganda can be divided into three major service groups offering professional services, construction services, and support services. These groups are monitored by regulatory bodies and institutions to ensure that they run systematically and in accordance with their objectives.
Challenges of the construction industry in Uganda and other developing countries
Whereas the importance of the construction industry, its challenges as well as risks are well publicised, with several similarirites in both developed and developing countries, the scale and magnitude of such challenges and risks in developing countries is much higher.
The World Bank (1984) summarises a number of such challenges in developing countries: inadequate procurement and contracting procedures leading to delayed payments without adequate compensation of contractors; inexperienced and excessively rigid contract supervision; inadequate trainining of staff; construction business proprietors who tend to outgrow their capacity to manage construction risk; lack of a sound framework for institutional and legal arragement; compromised construction standards and delayed completion of projects; price fluctuations of materials and other resources.
Wells (2007) has widely discussed the challenge of regulating the informal sector in most developing countries characterised by engagement of casual and temporary workers, direct procurement of construction services without formal contracts and without engagement of registered professionals and contractors, use of unregistered enterprises and the prevalence of unfinished structures usually without planning permission.
Furthermore, low levels of technology utilisation, out-dated construction methods, lack of financial capacity, low investment in research and development, as well as poor communication, poor workmanship, skills shortage and low levels of industrialisation continue to undermine the potential of Uganda’s construction industry to achieve higher development outcomes for the national economy (Alinaitwe, Mwakali and Hanson, 2006 & 2007; Katende, Alinaitwe and Tindiwensi, 2011).
However, whereas much of the research on improvement of performance in the construction industry focuses on contractors and their supply chains, Alinaitwe (2008) argues that the performance of construction industry clients on the supply chain is also questionable, as they frequently delay payments to contractors, and contribute to a majority of variations and change orders (attributable to incomplete designs and briefs) that arise during the construction phase of projects.
It can therefore be acknowledged that there is no simple solution that will resolve all the challenges Uganda’s construction industry faces, and therefore a continuous performance improvement agenda has to be upheld in order to reduce the performance gap between the construction industry and other sectors of the economy. This background therefore makes the potential of paradigms, work processes and technologies being introduced for the construction industries around the world such as Lean Construction, Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and Building Information Modelling (BIM) to address some of the challenges facing the construction industry of Uganda very relevant.
Find out more
- Alinaitwe, H., Mwakali, J. and Hansson, B. 2006. Assessing the degree of industrialisation in construction – A Case of Uganda. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. XII (3), pp. 221 – 229.
- Alinaitwe, H., Mwakali, J. and Hansson, B. 2007. Factors affecting the productivity of building craftsmen – studies of Uganda. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. XIII (3), pp. 169 – 176.
- Alinaitwe, H.M. 2008. Improvement of labour performance and productivity in Uganda’s building industry. PhD Thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
- Katende, J., Alinaitwe, H. and Tindiwensi, D. 2011. A Study into the Factors Hindering Development of the Construction Industry in Uganda. In: Advances in Engineering and Technology – Contribution of Scientific Research in Development, 332 – 338.
- Uganda National Commission for UNESCO. 2013. Uganda and UNESCO. Annual Information Magazine 2012/2013. [Online]. Available at: http://natcomreport.com/ [Accessed: 16 October 2013].
- Wells, J. 2007. Informality in the construction sector in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics 25, pp. 87 – 93.
- World Bank 1984. The Construction Industry Issues and Strategies in Developing Countries. World Bank, Washington, D.C. USA.
- World Bank. 2013. [Online]. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/overview [Accessed: 6 November 2013].
Featured articles and news
Insights from New York.
A quick introduction to a very complicated subject.
CIOB suggests the economic reach of construction is double the official figures.
The first US building to achieve BREEAM Outstanding In-Use.
70 buildings from 70 years of Concrete Quarterly. Book review.
Conserving the iron roof at the Albert Dock.
Delivering an infrastructure revolution.
The admissibility of evidence.
How many can you name? 37 anyone?
CIOB respond to the points-based system.
When is the weather considered 'exceptionally adverse'?