- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 29 Jun 2017
In the case of Ashfaq v International Insurance Compay of Hanover PLC , a property landlord found that out to his cost after neglecting to tell insurers that he was facing trial on an assault charge.
The man lodged a claim with insurers after a property that he let to students was gutted by fire. The proposal form for the insurance had specifically asked if he had any previous convictions or pending prosecutions, save in respect of motoring offences.
He answered that question in the negative although he was at the time awaiting trial on a common assault charge. He was subsequently convicted of that offence and received a £100 fine and a 24-month restraining order.
He launched proceedings against the insurers after they refused to indemnify him against his loss. His claim was, however, dismissed by a judge on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. His non-disclosure of the pending prosecution was material and the insurers were entitled to refuse cover.
In dismissing his challenge to that decision, the Court of Appeal found that he had no viable argument that the relevant parts of the policy were unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.
The policy was commercial in nature, in that he was letting the property to students as a business, and he could not be viewed as a ‘consumer’ within the meaning of the Regulations. The insurers thus had an unanswerable defence to his claim.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
A quick introduction to a very complicated subject.
CIOB suggests the economic reach of construction is double the official figures.
The first US building to achieve BREEAM Outstanding In-Use.
70 buildings from 70 years of Concrete Quarterly. Book review.
Conserving the iron roof at the Albert Dock.
Delivering an infrastructure revolution.
The admissibility of evidence.
How many can you name? 37 anyone?
CIOB respond to the points-based system.
When is the weather considered 'exceptionally adverse'?
ECA backs call for a rolling programme of rail electrification.