Wishcycling
|
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
Wishcycling (wish-cycling or aspirational recycling) describes the unfounded (although often well intentioned) belief that something is recyclable even though it is not. A person who wishcycles often does not know whether or not the item is recyclable, but hopes (or wishes) the item is dealt with in an environmentally responsible manner once it is collected along with other legitimately recyclable materials.
[edit] History
The term wishcycling originated in the waste and recycling industry in the United States. It is believed it was first used in 2015 by a journalist reporting on recycling who had heard an executive from the industry use the term to describe the impact of misdirected recycling activities. Since that time, it has become more widely adopted and is commonly used outside the recycling industry, particularly by the media.
[edit] Problems of wishcycling
Excessive wishcycling can contaminate recycling streams. In some instances, this can result in fines, warning notices or even the discontinuation of recycling initiatives.
Many modern products are made from multiple materials, which is why it can be difficult to be certain what items are recyclable. Considering how an item is made may make it easier to determine whether or not it can be recycled.
In addition, what may be recyclable in one area may not be acceptable in another. Single stream or dual stream recycling policies dictate different sorting practices.
[edit] Resolving wishcycling
Learning which items can and cannot be recycled can help put an end to wishcycling.
The simple act of keeping materials clean (for instance, cleaning off residual substances that contaminate the waste stream) can also be helpful.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles
Check out some of the best features and news from Designing Buildings as well as key stories from around the web.
Mayors are to be given planning call in powers
Mayors across England will be able to make the most important planning decisions.
The Master Builder: William Butterfield and his times. Book review.
Why construction can't afford to ignore the skills gap.
Building Safety Regulator, 19 August
Gill Kernick appointed Independent Chair of Residents’ Panel.
Connecting knowledge, technology and conservation
Building competence for the future of built heritage.
Building Regulations and Building Safety Act
CIOB publishes free advice for non-domestic clients.
Building Safety Newsletter from MHCLG.
An extraordinary record of steel engineering worldwide.
Households living near new pylons to save on bills.
ECA warns growth must not outpace grid capacity or skills.
The role of the client and decision making
CIOB response to built environment professions call for evidence.
Construction's sustainability reporting revolution
Tracking upfront embodied carbon with digital tools.


















