A quick guide to LRV specification and lifts
Lift design is ever-evolving and without a doubt, specifying the right surface or object reflectance for lift cabin finishes is key to designing a building that everyone can use – especially the visually impaired.
What is LRV?
It is important not to confuse light reflectance value (LRV) with colour intensity. LRV measures how much light a colour reflects and absorbs. It runs from 0% to 100%.
Zero is assumed to be an absolute black and 100% an assumed perfectly reflective white. Approximately speaking, the average blackest black has an LRV of 5% and the whitest white at 85%. Some yellows can measure up into the ’80s or 90s as well.
Why is LRV important?
For the majority of people, colour differences can provide adequate visual contrast. However, this is not the case for all building users. People with vision impairments often distinguish surfaces by the amount of light they reflect. The greater the difference between LRV and adjacent materials, the more likely the difference in surfaces will be identified, for example enabling the visually impaired to identify controls or distinguish lift car doors from adjacent walls.
Examples of where visual contrast and LRV difference between finishes can be required in lifts:
- The call panel should be easily distinguishable from its background.
- The floor area outside the lift and lift car doors should be visually distinguishable from the adjoining walls.
- Lighting and surfaces within the lift car should minimise glare, reflection, confusing shadows and pools of light and dark.
- Lights adjacent to control panels are not recommended because they could make it difficult for people to read controls.
What do the building regulations and design guidance say?
As far as building regulations are concerned, and where compliance with Technical Guidance Document Part M 2010 is required, it is important to ensure that elements of a building do not pose a risk to people with vision impairments.
References for LRV tend to be in Building standards and design guidelines rather than specific lift standards. Below are some of the references to contrast and LRV that you should consider.
Part M - General guidance
Contrast visually, when used to indicate the visual perception of one element of the building, or fitting within the building against another means that the difference in light reflective value between the two surfaces is greater than 30 points. Where illuminance on surface is greater than 200 lux, a difference in light reflective value should be a minimum of 20 points. Where door opening furniture projects beyond the face of the door or otherwise creates enhance differentiation and shade a minimum difference in LRV of 15 points is considered adequate (1)
General requirements for lifting devices – Design Considerations
3.28d - All call and control buttons contrast visually with the surrounding face place, and the face plate similarly contrasts with the surface on which it is mounted.
3.28e – The floor of the lifting device should not be of a dark colour and should have frictionless qualities similar to or higher than, the floor of the landing;
Technical Handbook (Scotland)
States that lift doors, handrails and controls should contrast visually with surrounding surfaces (no reference to actual values).
BS 8300-2:2016
Advises doors and floors to contrast visually with their surroundings – no reference to values.
Lifts Standards
The only lift standard citing LRV are passenger lift standards (> 0.15m/s) within BS EN 81-70:2018 - Accessibility to lifts for persons, including persons with disability. Here the onus is on the customer to comply with lift identification to the background, and faceplates to its surrounding.
Conclusion
Increasingly there are more requests for colour considerations as awareness grows over visual impairments and increasing awareness of how dementia affects visual perception.
1) For further information, reference should be made to Colour, contrast and perception – Design guidance for internal build environments – Reading University.
--Stannahlifts 11:47, 20 May 2022 (BST)
Featured articles and news
Artificial intelligence and project management
Two new research reports published by APM.
Association for Project Management membership offer
50% off APM Associate membership for Designing Buildings users.
Building safety, a shifting landscape for professionals
A commentary from the insurance perspective.
In brief with further links.
Walter Segal: self-built architect
A definitive book on a pioneer of green architecture.
Funding for heritage on the high street
Using heritage as a catalyst for reviving historic centres.
Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting update.
Declaration prioritising sustainable urbanisation adopted.
A small hidden, often distant but key building component.
Some brief words about the actuator.
CIAT Chief Executive steps down.
After 34 years at the Institute.
Volunteer opportunity launched by the ICE
To support the next generation of engineers.
Provisional findings show illegal cartels in the industry.
CIAT reporting from the Competition and Markets Authority.
Making sustainable construction number one priority.
The future of construction report.
Interview with ECA CEO.
Many provisions came into force on June 28, 2022.
With room to expand.
An information packed session at the BSRIA conference.
Refurbishment, Energy Efficiency, Indoor air and process.
Considering building acoustics with the AT Journal.
Why building acoustic considerations must be non-negotiable.
Create a profile, write informed product articles and share.
Aluminium Composite Panels (ACP) is one example.
Top 50 Women in engineering 2022.
Inventors and innovators at ICE.
Life, death and art at the Stuart court. Book review.
Real estate, place adaptation and innovation.
Review and comment on the revised draft before July 11.
We are indeed now 10 years old, so go on and be bold !
Write about something you know, help us build and grow !
IHBC's 25th anniversary 2022 Aberdeen School.
A blended event and triumphant return.
New Construction Leadership Council Co-Chair selected.
Mark Reynolds succeeds Andy Mitchell as Co-Chair of CLC