- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 03 Feb 2015
A case study of adopting BIT-Kit: A method uncovering the impact buildings have on people
Author: Dr Lesley J McIntyre
In current architectural discourse there is a lack of method in building evidence to understand the link between buildings and the wellbeing, independence and mobility of the people who use them. In response to this knowledge gap, the Building Interactions Toolkit (BIT-Kit) supports the gathering of real-world interaction evidence within buildings. Applying a mixed‐methods approach, BIT-Kit evidence is generated through the combination of purposeful conversation, observation and building interaction data.
This paper introduces the motivations behind BIT-Kit and evaluates evidence uncovered through a case study, which investigates the task of way-finding in a public building by persons with visual impairment. Findings illustrate novel evidence of human interaction with architectural elements (such as stairs, doors, car-parks and corridors) that enable and disable building users. These findings define evidence in assessing the impact of buildings on people.
Featured articles and news
Using QSAND to measure the performance of disaster response.
What U-values are, why they matter and how they are calculated.
The need to ensure that we plan for all aspects of our bio-economy
BSRIA calls on government to reach deeper into the causes of pollution.
George Demetri brings a whole new level of technical knowledge to Designing Buildings Wiki.
Quality professionals need to take an active role in driving the completion process forwards.
The innovations needed to move from rhetoric to realisation.
Creating a sense of place, with radically-low running costs and the highest comfort levels.
A conversation between David Mitchell and Caitlin DeSilvey.
A quick guide to brick sizes.
The Union Street development in Southwark was a passion, as well as a business endeavour.
Do our water quality standards demonstrate to the public that their supply is clean?
A third of practitioners do not have easy access to the knowledge they need.