U-value conventions in practice: Worked examples using BR 443
BRE (Building Research Establishment) is an independent, research-based consultancy, testing and training organisation, operating in the built environment and associated industries.
U-value conventions in practice: Worked examples using BR 443 was written by Sean Doran and published by BRE on 13 Jan 2012. The 36 page publication helps designers develop a better understanding of how to calculate U-values and kappa-values for use in calculation tools. See also Conventions for U-value calculations (2006 edition) BR 443.
U-values, (sometimes referred to as thermal transmittances) measured in W/m²K represent how effective elements of a buildings fabric are as insulators. That is, how effective they are at preventing heat from transmitting between the inside and outside of a building. The lower the U-value of an element of a building's fabric, the more slowly heat is able to transmit through it, and so the better it performs as an insulator.
Kappa values (sometimes referred to as thermal mass values) measured in kJ/m2K represent the heat capacity per square metre of a material. This is used to quantify the thermal mass of building elements such as walls and floors. The higher the kappa-value, the greater the thermal mass, that is the more heat the element is able to store.
These values are integral to the use of energy calculation tools such as the Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP) and the Simplified Building Energy Model (SBEM), which support Part L of the Building Regulations, Conservation of Fuel and Power. As a result, it is important that they are calculated reliably.
U-value conventions in practice:
- Supports the Building Regulations Part L and other legislation on the energy performance of buildings.
- Helps raise an awareness of and understanding of U-values and kappa-values.
- Encourages a unified, consistent approach to calculating U-values and kappa-values.
- Explains calculation methods using worked examples for wall, roof and floor designs.
- Supports training programmes for practitioners carrying out energy assessments and using U-value calculation software.
- Provides guidance about calculating U-values using standard simplified methods.
Its contents include:
- Introduction.
- Summary outline of the U-value calculation method.
- The worked examples.
- References and further reading.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Approved document L.
- BRE articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- Building regulations.
- Building Research Establishment.
- Conventions for calculating linear thermal transmittance and temperature factors.
- Conventions for U-value calculations (2006 edition) BR 443.
- Energy performance certificate.
- Insulation.
- Kappa value.
- PA ratio.
- Simplified Building Energy Model.
- Standard Assessment Procedure.
- Thermal bridge.
- Thermal mass.
- U value.
- What do design professionals need to know about U-value calculation conventions?
Featured articles
Check out some of the best features and news from Designing Buildings as well as key stories from around the web.
England's Suburbs 1820-2020. Book review.
New, more proportionate and targeted approach for higher-risk building assessments.
Government brings British Steel into public ownership.
UKCW Birmingham returns with bold new theme and focus.
New guidance published on competence requirements for self-certification schemes.
Construction Management, 8 July
NEETs crisis drives interest in trades, but apprenticeships barriers remain.
Passive fire protection webinar
MEP services penetration seals.
Where its at podcast (and video) - The role of the Architectural Technologist as an Expert Witness.
More than 200 remarkable buildings added to SAVE’s Buildings at Risk register.
Government scraps pre-application consultation for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects.
Historic England and infrastructure
New projects offer opportunities for the historic environment and local communities.
Construction Management, 2 July
Construction deaths halve in two years.



















Comments