Taylor Review - Sustainability of English Churches and Cathedrals
On 20 December 2017, an independent review was published calling for greater community use to give church buildings a sustainable future. The Taylor Review: Sustainability of English Churches and Cathedrals, published by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) recommends that churches should be opened for new and different uses to empower congregations and help value and care for the buildings.
Since 1999, £2.6 billion has been invested in repairs to churches and cathedrals and new build projects, with government and lottery sources funding £810 million of this. In total, 12,200 Church of England (CoE) churches are listed. The purpose of the review, instigated in 2016, was to investigate ways of maintaining CoE churches, potentially through different funding models. The review panel was chaired by Bernard Taylor and included representatives from the Church of England (CoE) as well as other heritage bodies.
The review highlights and encourages the way some buildings have been adapted to include uses such as cafes, playgroups and other community activities. It proposes creating a national network of Community Support Advisers to identify new means by which churches can be used more frequently by the local community and to maximise new funding options.
The panel found that, despite the hard work of volunteers from congregations, there was a lack of consistency in churches' ability to perform routine maintenance and repairs. They recommended creating a group of Fabric Support Officers who would have expertise in heritage buildings, ensuring churches have access to professional advice. In addition, they suggested churches develop annual minor repairs plans, so that more costly major repairs can be prevented through early action. Larger works should be planned and properly funded through a rolling ten-year major repairs plan.
Bernard Taylor, Chairman of the English Churches and Cathedrals Sustainability Review, said:
"Church buildings are an important and a much-loved part of our national heritage and form an integral part of our sense of identity and community. However, despite the hard work of many groups and volunteers around the country, they face complex problems of maintenance and repair, and are not always well used and supported.
"Increased use and helping communities in their broadest form to see the value and potential of the local church is the key to the church building becoming more self-sustaining and ultimately ensuring its long term survival. The solution must be local and there is no instant solution, but these recommendations represent the next steps towards a more sustainable future for these important buildings."
Heritage Minister John Glen said:
"This report has shown how valued these buildings are and how many thousands of volunteers work so hard on their upkeep. This review is an important first step to building a more sustainable future for thousands of church buildings across the country, and we will look at these recommendations carefully."
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Secure low-cost ‘early-bird’ places and share heritage, conservation and EYCH 2018 across CPD talks, tours and networks, June 21/22/23!
Chairs of the IHBC and of COTAC signed an MoU to ‘help build capacity across the sector’ in London on 21 February 2018.
The IHBC has submitted its response on the consultation draft from Historic England (HE) on its revised ‘Guidance on Conservation Principles’.
Am Fasgadh Regeneration Company, Kingussie, seeks design team for project valued at £350K, closing 19/03.
Council report recommending demolition of 26 Dundee flats was ‘seriously misleading’.
HE has issued its February Planning Bulletin update, including curtilage guidance launch update, currently under review by the IHBC.
CADW’s most recent publications and best practice guidance on the sustainable management of the Welsh historic environment are available online.
MHCLG’s consultation sets out circumstances when a pre-commencement planning condition can be imposed without the written agreement of the applicant.
Liverpool Council, with the government and Historic England, has drafted a report on its proposed measures to persuade UNESCO to remove the site from ‘in danger’ list.