- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 11 May 2018
Site Waste Management Plans – A Necessary Burden
Following a comprehensive government review of 21,000 regulations on different themes, Site Waste Management Plans (SWMP) will no longer be compulsory for construction projects in England from 1 December 2013. However, they may still be required by BREEAM, the local planning authority, by the main contractor or by client (ref Environment Agency Bulletin Issue 24 November 2013).
In the Red Tape Challenge – Environment Theme Proposals issued in March 2012, DEFRA wrote, “You told us to remove Site Waste Management Plans Regulations because they force companies to spend time and money estimating their waste production when they could be reducing waste through more effective activities, such as training employees”
It is unclear how a client or contractor can actually provide useful training to their employees or implement “more effective activities” without having first understood their waste streams. A study conducted in 2009 by the Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP) revealed that 76% of the businesses questioned thought that the SWMP regulations had saved them money or were cost neutral. This seems logical as a good SWMP will helps prioritise efforts on the big savers. An SWMP is not an end in itself but a useful instrument to encourage companies and their supply chain to assess, quantify, analyse and monitor their waste.
The performance of the construction and demolition industries has steadily improved over the years as waste disposal has become more expensive. However, the industry still does not maximise the value of their waste with down-cycling regularly promoted over recycling or reuse; and often the most significant savings associated with avoiding material use in the first instance through design or supply chain innovations, are still overlooked. This is the true value of the SWMP.
Scrapping the regulations gives the wrong signal to the industry. It implies the SWMP is not an effective tool to address material consumption and identify cost savings. Proactive and savvy clients and contractors are likely to continue to utilise SWMP's to maximise material resource efficiency and generate cost saving. Hopefully the rest of industry will follow suit.
For more information see: Site waste management plans.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Bin blight.
- BREEAM Construction waste management.
- BREEAM Operational waste.
- BRE SMARTwaste.
- Circular economy.
- Construction skip.
- Definition of waste: Code of practice.
- Deleterious materials.
- Environmental plan.
- Hazardous substances.
- Landfill tax.
- Logistics management.
- Materials Management Plan (MMP).
- Recyclable construction materials.
- Rubble chute.
- Site records and registers.
- Site storage.
- Soil survey.
- Waste management plan for England.
- Wheel washing system.
Featured articles and news
BSRIA report suggest the European market will double to 415 million Euros by 2023.
Do you understand the different types of stone and which ones you should use where?
Why a wellbeing strategy is vital for property managers.
An ECA briefing for members about the commercial implications of leaving the EU.
A crucial moment on any project - and fraught with danger.
The performance gap from a Northern Ireland perspective.
Book review: Buildings of protestant nonconformity.
Design and testing for health and wellbeing - free download from BRE.
Retention in construction contracts.
Campaign for the reform of cash retentions.
The key points for the construction industry and BSRIA's response.