- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 08 Dec 2015
New infrastructure planning survey
Perhaps the main issue the Commission will need to address is the finding that while 87% support infrastructure investment, only 6% believe there is a ‘very well coordinated’ national or local plan to deliver it. Community engagement scored highest (41%) when it came to the question of what would best increase confidence in the infrastructure sector.
The independent survey of attitudes to infrastructure in Great Britain 2015 was published by Copper Consultancy and Peter Brett Associates and is based on a sample survey of 2,000 individuals and focus groups. The report was launched at the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) by the NIC chairman Lord Adonis, and recently-appointed ICE president John Armitt.
The results reveal a sense that most people feel uninvolved and ignored by politicians and other decision-makers in terms of infrastructure development priorities. One of the report’s conclusions is that a more ‘joined up approach’ and ‘more leadership’ is required to promote a more positive vision of future infrastructure projects.
- Renewable energy (43%).
- More house-building (39%).
- Waste from energy plants (32%).
- Railways (31%).
- Flood defences (30%).
- Motorways/A-roads (28%).
- Nuclear power projects (19%).
- Airports (8%).
- Coal and gas power stations (8%).
Lord Adonis said: “This report is timely and vital. For too long the British people have been forced to put up with chaos, congestion and costs, thanks to successive governments’ failure to build the long-term infrastructure this country needs. So as we establish the independent National Infrastructure Commission, it is clear we have to utterly transform the way we plan and deliver major projects in this country.
“This survey shows that the public want proper investment and planning behind world class developments. But whilst the support is there for real improvement, people rightly demand proper engagement and genuine consultation. It is now up to the industry as a whole to take these findings forward and build the broad coalition of support we need to secure the projects of the future.
Sir John Armitt said: “Public interest in infrastructure is as much driven by fear of disrupted lives as it is by a promise of greater convenience, speed or improved quality of life. The challenge for us all – ICE, government and the NIC alike - is to open up the debate and address these fears. Our ability to explain – in plain language - what we are trying to achieve and why, to be prepared to consider alternative solutions and to put ourselves in the public’s shoes is absolutely vital if we are to gain sufficient political and public support, without which important projects simply cannot proceed.”
Featured articles and news
Assembling, curating, caring for, and designing the future.
A sensitive approach to renovating a building of historic stature.
UK energy policy uncertainty as Welsh project put on hold
What collaborative working achieves and how it can be put in place.
BSRIA publishes the 2019 edition of its small but concise annual databook.
Using QSAND to measure the performance of disaster response.
What U-values are, why they matter and how they are calculated.
The need to ensure that we plan for all aspects of our bio-economy
BSRIA calls on government to reach deeper into the causes of pollution.
George Demetri brings a whole new level of technical knowledge to Designing Buildings Wiki.
Quality professionals need to take an active role in driving the completion process forwards.
The innovations needed to move from rhetoric to realisation.