- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 19 Nov 2016
Government response to the report of the House of Lords Select Committee on the built environment
On 8 November 2016, the government published Government response to the report of the House of Lords Select Committee on the built environment. This was a response to Building Better Places, published by the House of Lords Select Committee on National Policy for the Built Environment on 19 February 2016 against the background of the continuing housing crisis.
Building Better Places included a sweeping range of recommendations that challenged some of the government’s policy initiatives. It urged reversing the scrapping of the zero carbon homes initiative, reinstating the chief construction adviser role, reviewing local authority borrowing restrictions, and allowing a bigger role for local authorities and housing associations.
However, there were a number of specific rejections:
It rejected the proposal for a chief construction adviser, instead proposing strengthening the role of the chief planner. The response stated, 'At present the chief planner provides the central leadership to ensure the planning system supports the delivery of housing growth, climate change, sustainable economic development and works to protect and enhance the natural environment...We consider this a better use of resources than creating a specific new senior role."
In response to the recommendation that the government reverse its decision to scrap zero carbon homes and remove the Code for Sustainable Homes, it stated ‘We need to build more homes and these should be sustainable, but we do not need to make building those new homes more difficult than necessary.’
It did not agree that borrowing restrictions limit local authorities development capacity, saying ‘These limits are part of the government’s programme to reduce public sector debt – and there are no plans to remove these limits.’
In response to the recommendation to reconsider including starter homes within the definition of affordable housing it said it was important that, ‘…the definition of affordable housing for planning purposes supports present and future innovation by housing providers in meeting the needs of a wide range of households who are unable to access market housing.’
However, in response to a recommendation to review the rates of VAT charged on repairs to listed buildings, the door was left slightly open to a post-Brexit change by the response ‘Until negotiations on our departure from the European Union are complete our rights and obligations remain unchanged. That includes the application of EU VAT rules.’
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Affordable housing.
- Building Better Places.
- Chief construction adviser.
- Chief planner.
- Code for sustainable homes.
- Farrell review.
- Government construction strategy.
- Government Construction Strategy 2016 2020.
- House of Lords Select Committee on National Policy for the Built Environment.
- Select committee for the built environment.
- Select committee.
- Starter homes.
- Zero carbon homes.
Featured articles and news
When is there a right to light, and what happens if it is obstructed?
What would the nationalisation of economic infrastructure mean for GB?
A new guide to improving value by reducing design error.
We've reached 80,000 page views a day and 10,000 registered users. Why not join them?
A masterplan is a framework within which a location is encouraged to develop or change. Read our introductory article.
New consultation announced on a specialist Housing Court to settle landlord-tenant disputes.
ICE responds to a transport consultation advising the government to make decisions enabling more inclusive cities.
BRE and Loughborough University complete first phase refurbishment of demonstration home.
How the risk of collapse of fibrous plaster ceilings is being addressed in theatres.
If you’re a great writer and have practical experience of the construction industry, it could be you.
Frustrated by long documents or technical jargon? Put off by sign-up forms or costs? Take this 5 min survey to help improve construction knowledge.