Future purchasers and tenants
To help develop this article, click 'Edit this article' above.
The original developer and often the first purchaser or tenant of a property will have an opportunity to enter into direct contractual arrangements to protect themselves against latent defects. It is unlikely that subsequent purchasers or tenants will have such an opportunity, unless they fall within the scope of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, and they will be (adopting the terminology of the rule of privity of contract) strangers to the original contractual arrangements with no remedies in contract against the parties responsible for the design and construction of the building.
The courts have often said in such circumstances that the law of contract provides for a chain of indemnity connecting the ultimate user with the original producer: for example D is the ultimate user or consumer who purchased from C the retailer, C having purchased from B the wholesaler and B having purchased from A the manufacturer. D can sue C for breach of contract but not B or A. However, if C is sued by D, then C will have a right of indemnity against B who in turn has a right of indemnity against A, creating 'the chain of indemnity' that links the manufacturer to the ultimate user.
Unfortunately, the strength of a chain of indemnity is only as great as its weakest link. If C the retailer becomes insolvent a critical link in the chain between D and A will have been broken. Further, a purchaser of a freehold building is faced with the difficulty of the principle of ‘caveat emptor’ (buyer beware) and the tenant of a leasehold building with the difficulty of full repairing covenants in the lease.
The future purchaser or tenant must rely on derivative contractual rights. Such rights arise by assignment, which is a unilateral act, or by novation that is synallagmatic (each party is bound to provide something to the other party – see Essentials of a contract).
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
What will the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) mean for you when they come into force in May?
Business Secretary chairs a new taskforce to monitor and advise on mitigating the impacts of Carillion’s liquidation.
Sir John Armitt is appointed the new chair of the National Infrastructure Commission.
High quality and high density homes - is it what we need or is it storing up trouble?
Government announces its intention to strengthen planning rules to protect music venues and neighbours.
National Audit Office reports that there is little evidence that PFI offers better value than other forms of contracting.
What is liquidation and how does it apply to contractors in the construction industry?
Scrutiny is placed on Carillion's controversial 2013 decision to extend subcontractor payment terms to 120 days.
RSHP unveil their involvement in a boundary crossing which will provide a new entry point into Hong Kong.
With PFI currently under the spotlight due to Carillion, this introductory article explains what they are.
Estimates suggest that up to 30,000 small firms could be at risk of non-payment as a result of Carillion's collapse.