Last edited 12 Sep 2022

Calderbank offer

A Calderbank offer is a settlement offer made on a "without prejudice save as to costs" basis.

It is an approach used to settle a dispute for a lower amount and avoid going to a court trial. It puts one side on notice that if the dispute goes before a court, and the outcome is worse than the Calderbank offer being made, the party making the Calderbank offer is entitled to higher recovery court costs, the fact the offer has been made may also be taken into account when considering the costs awarded.

Important constituents of such an offer are:

It is named after the case Calderbank v. Calderbank in 1975. Mrs Calderbank before the dispute proceeded to the courts, showed she had a willingness to settle the dispute. If Mr Calderbank had accepted the offer made to him before the trial, he would have been in a better position because the outcome was less favourable to him than Mrs Calderbank’s earlier offer, and then neither would have had to go to court. The court ruled that Mrs Calderbank was entitled to her costs as from the date that she made her willingness to settle known.

It is an alternative to a Part 36 offer, which is a written offer to settle with a period of not less than 21 days during which it can be accepted. If it is not accepted in the stated period and the other party does not beat that offer then there will be costs consequences.

[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings

Designing Buildings Anywhere

Get the Firefox add-on to access 20,000 definitions direct from any website

Find out more Accept cookies and
don't show me this again