- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 09 Jun 2021
Traditional contract - pros and cons
Under this route, the client first appoints consultants to design the project in detail and then prepare tender documentation, including drawings, work schedules and bills of quantities. Contractors are then invited to submit tenders for the construction of the project, usually on a single-stage, competitive basis. The contractor is not responsible for the design, other than temporary works, although some traditional contracts do provide for the contractor to design specific parts of the works.
It is considered by some that one of the main advantages of the traditional method is the greater certainty. This is because the design is finalised before contractors are appointed, and so there is clarity about precisely what is required and how much it is likely to cost.
This is as opposed, for example, to the design and build procurement route, where the tender process begins before the design is complete. This can lead to unexpected costs or other issues as after tender, and some believe that as the design is completed by the contractor, rather than by an 'independent' design team, the quality may be lower.
However, it can be slower than other forms of contracting, and as the contractor is appointed only once the design is complete. This also means the contractor is not able to help improve the buildability of the design, or to input into the packaging of the works as they develop.
There may also be cost disadvantages entailed in the traditional method, as costs may rise if a large number of changes are made to the original design. In addition, since quantities are specified in, the contractor has little flexibility to manage the price and provide better value.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Training reflects updated guidance in BSRIA BG 29/2021.
Complete list of 2021 winners now available.
Recognising past and present role models for the future.
So why not write something?
LETI publishes guidance for energy efficient home retrofits.
Predictions about adequate post-pandemic IAQ in non-domestic buildings.
Government publishes plans to 'build back greener'.
The contentious nature of claims associated with cladding, fire safety and EWS1 forms.
ECA comments on low-carbon heating systems initiative and Heat and Buildings Strategy.