Product transparency declaration
The PVC industry has been heavily targeted in the past for the environmental and human health impacts associated with its manufacture, use and disposal. Many industries however benefit from the cost-effectiveness, versatility and light-weight nature of this plastic.
Now, the Resilient Floor Covering Institute, which represents over 95% of resilient flooring manufacturers in North America, including; cork, vinyl, linoleum, and rubber, have launched a new Product Transparency Declaration (PTD). The PTD takes the information provided in Environmental Product Declarations and Health Product Declarations to enable specifiers to understand if the ingredients used in a finished product are in a final form or high enough concentration to be harmful to the health of a building occupant.
This PTD is promoted as easier for manufacturers to navigate and for architects and contractors to understand. In the new PTD the manufacturers are required to list the contents of the finished product as opposed to listing the ingredients used to make the product. This will ensure that the information regarding the catalysts and other by-products of chemical reactions that are dissipated during the manufacturing process are also disclosed and not just the pure raw materials. This will create more transparency about the final product delivered on site.
Another interesting approach the PTD has taken is to simplify the declaration process. According to William Freeman, technical consultant to the Resilient Floor Covering Institute, the current Health Product Declaration is not easy to fill out. This has resulted in a range of consultants charging thousands of dollars to manufacturers to fill out the Health Product Declaration, money that could be more usefully spent on research and reformulation.
The PTD has a more straight forward approach to declaring product contents. The PTD’s are expected to be published voluntarily by product manufacturers but will be verified with the signature of a responsible company official.
It remains to be seen how the industry respond to this new voluntary approach, however, improved simplicity and transparency which enables time and money to be focused on research to exclude the most harmful chemicals rather than paperwork must be applauded.
Although this is not the first time a product manufacturer has created an alternative to the existing environmental standards, it is exciting to see industry driving change from within rather than waiting for legislation.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
IHBC book review: Charles Barry’s monumental struggle to rebuild the Houses of Parliament.
Read about RSHP's British Museum extension which has been shortlisted for the 2017 Stirling Prize.
Read our introductory article to building a house extension.
More updates from DCMS about the large-scale testing of cladding systems and the number of buildings affected.
UandI secure resolution to grant planning consent for major new regeneration project.
IHBC article considers how heritage is dealt with when infrastructure schemes are authorised.
It was the tallest structure in the world for 3,800 years, but to this day the exact construction techniques are a mystery.
Shortlist for the industry's most coveted award announced.
Government responds to Mark Farmer's review of industry, rejecting the call for a levy on clients.
Peter Hansford to examine what wider lessons can be learned from the fire.
Every project is subject to uncertainty. How can construction better understand uncertainty for performance improvement?
MAD Architects reveal their designs for a futuristic campus for electric car manufacturer.
Homebuyers could borrow more with better forecasting of energy bills, according to industry consortium's new report.