Nominated supplier
In the construction industry, ‘supplier’ is a very general term which refers to organisations contracted as part of the delivery of a built asset.
Typically, a contractor is able to purchase from their own choice of supplier, as long as they comply with the requirements set out in the specification. However, under certain circumstances, the client may wish to impose (or nominate) a particular supplier on the main contractor after the main contractor has been appointed.
The client may wish to use a particular supplier because:
- A particular product brand is required.
- The particular goods provided by the supplier are not widely available.
- There is an existing relationship with the supplier.
- Long delivery items are required where ordering is necessary before the appointment of a main contractor.
- Specialist design input is required in the early stages of design development.
- Complex or specialist industrial plant or equipment may be required, upon which the design will be based.
The mechanism for nominating is an instruction in relation to a prime cost sum to which the main contractor is entitled to add mark up and attendance costs. This allows the client to have direct separate negotiations with suppliers and feed their appointment into the contract after works by the main contractor have commenced.
A potential drawback of nominating a supplier is that the contractor is then not able to ‘shop around’ to obtain the best price or supplier. It is important therefore that suppliers are nominated with due consideration to their ability to supply in line with the project specification, programme and budget.
In addition, as the contractor has no choice in the selection of the nominated sub-contractor, they cannot be held responsible for their failure to perform. However, as the supply contract is with the main contractor, not with the client, the client should ensure that they have a direct warranty with the nominated supplier to guarantee performance and indemnify the client if any default allows a claim for loss and expense or extension of time by the main contractor.
The complexity of this situation means that some forms of contract no longer include provision for the nomination, preferring to 'name' suppliers instead.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Repairing historic stone and slate roofs
The need for a code of practice and technical advice note.
UKCW London to tackle sector’s most pressing issues
AI and skills development, ecology and the environment, policy and planning and more.
Managing building safety risks
Across an existing residential portfolio; a client's perspective.
ECA support for Gate Safe’s Safe School Gates Campaign.
Core construction skills explained
Preparing for a career in construction.
Retrofitting for resilience with the Leicester Resilience Hub
Community-serving facilities, enhanced as support and essential services for climate-related disruptions.
Some of the articles relating to water, here to browse. Any missing?
Recognisable Gothic characters, designed to dramatically spout water away from buildings.
A case study and a warning to would-be developers
Creating four dwellings... after half a century of doing this job, why, oh why, is it so difficult?
Reform of the fire engineering profession
Fire Engineers Advisory Panel: Authoritative Statement, reactions and next steps.
Restoration and renewal of the Palace of Westminster
A complex project of cultural significance from full decant to EMI, opportunities and a potential a way forward.
Apprenticeships and the responsibility we share
Perspectives from the CIOB President as National Apprentice Week comes to a close.
The first line of defence against rain, wind and snow.
Building Safety recap January, 2026
What we missed at the end of last year, and at the start of this.



















