- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 04 Jan 2019
National compensation code
The national compensation code (the compensation code or the land compensation code) is the collective term for the principles derived from statute and case law, relating to compensation for compulsory acquisition, which ensures that when land is needed for an infrastructure project, the owners receive compensation to help them relocate. The code also ensures that those who experience real, physical events, for example vibration or noise, from a scheme once it is in operation are entitled to compensation.
Formally there is no actual code. It is not a single document, but comprises a collection of enactments, consisting primarily of the Land Compensation Act 1961, the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 and the Land Compensation Act 1973 (as amended by the Planning and Compensation Act 1991 and the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004), supplemented by case law informing the effect of these provisions and their predecessors.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Compulsory purchase.
- Compulsory purchase orders for listed buildings.
- Crichel Down rules.
- Empty dwelling management orders.
- Empty housing in London - documentary.
- National planning policy framework.
- Nationally significant infrastructure projects.
- Neighbourhood Planning Bill 2016-17.
- Planning and Compensation Act 1991.
- Planning permission.
- Property blight.
- Safeguarded land.
Featured articles and news
Insights from New York.
A quick introduction to a very complicated subject.
CIOB suggests the economic reach of construction is double the official figures.
The first US building to achieve BREEAM Outstanding In-Use.
70 buildings from 70 years of Concrete Quarterly. Book review.
Conserving the iron roof at the Albert Dock.
Delivering an infrastructure revolution.
The admissibility of evidence.
How many can you name? 37 anyone?
CIOB respond to the points-based system.
When is the weather considered 'exceptionally adverse'?