Counterclaim in construction
A counterclaim is a claim set up in opposition to another claim, that is, a claim by a party against a another party who has made a claim against them. This is not a defence to a claim, it is separate from it and proceeds even if the original claim is ended.
Counterclaims are often confused with abatement and set off.
Set off (or contra charging) is only permitted if a breach of contract by a party making a claim is so closely associated with the claim that it would not be just to consider the claim without also taking the breach into account (or where the claims are both for payment of readily ascertained debts).
Whilst set off is often accompanied by a counterclaim it is to be distinguished in that a counterclaim may be entirely different in nature to the claim, and set off, unlike a counterclaim, cannot give rise to a positive balance of claim whilst a counterclaim may exceed the amount of the initial claim.
Abatement argues that an amount claimed is incorrect because of defects in the work. If the defect is proved, then the valuation of the amount due may be reduced by the reduction in value of the works resulting from the defect.
Counterclaims can be used as tactics in legal cases, to confuse or delay proceedings, or to reduce awards. However, this has risks associated with it, and may simply result in higher costs.
Before the 2011 amendments to the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act, set off and counterclaim were only permitted if a withholding notice was issued, whilst abatement did not require a withholding notice as the value of the works had been reduced and there was only an obligation to pay the amount properly due.
Since 2011 however, set off, counterclaim and abatement all require that a pay less notice is issued.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Abatement.
- Adjudication.
- Alternative dispute resolution.
- Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act.
- Set off.
[edit] External references
- A Straume (UK) Ltd v Bradlor Developments Ltd.
- Urang Commercial v Century Investments and Eclipse Hotels (Luton).
- Whyte and Mackay Ltd v Blyth & Blyth Consulting Engineers.
Featured articles and news
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.
CIOB photographic competition final images revealed
Art of Building produces stunning images for another year.
HSE prosecutes company for putting workers at risk
Roofing company fined and its director sentenced.
Strategic restructure to transform industry competence
EBSSA becomes part of a new industry competence structure.
Major overhaul of planning committees proposed by government
Planning decisions set to be fast-tracked to tackle the housing crisis.
Industry Competence Steering Group restructure
ICSG transitions to the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) under the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).
Principal Contractor Competency Certification Scheme
CIOB PCCCS competence framework for Principal Contractors.
The CIAT Principal Designer register
Issues explained via a series of FAQs.
Conservation in the age of the fourth (digital) industrial revolution.
Shaping the future of heritage
Embracing the evolution of economic thinking.
Ministers to unleash biggest building boom in half a century
50 major infrastructure projects, 5 billion for housing and 1.5 million homes.
RIBA Principal Designer Practice Note published
With key descriptions, best practice examples and FAQs, with supporting template resources.
Electrical businesses brace for project delays in 2025
BEB survey reveals over half worried about impact of delays.
Accelerating the remediation of buildings with unsafe cladding in England
The government publishes its Remediation Acceleration Plan.
Airtightness in raised access plenum floors
New testing guidance from BSRIA out now.