- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 02 Feb 2018
Cohabiting - who owns what?
The woman owned three properties. Following the acrimonious end of their relationship, her ex-partner claimed that they had treated their assets as a 'single pot' when they were together. In what he described as a joint venture, he said that he had put much money, resources and physical effort into renovating one of her properties in particular, rendering it fit for human habitation.
In rejecting his claim, however, the First-tier Tribunal found that he had fallen far short of establishing that there was a common intention that he should have a share in the properties, which were held in her sole name. He had made no direct contribution to mortgage repayments and there had been no pooling of money.
Although the repair and maintenance work he carried out was not insignificant, it was a reflection of his desire to assist her whilst they were living together as husband and wife and was not attributable to any pecuniary self-interest on his part. She had continued to take sole responsibility for her properties, paying all outgoings, and had never promised him that his work would earn him a share in them.
This article was written by Rex Cowell. It was published as 'Cohabiting couples - who owns what?' on 24 March 2016.
See other articles by Rex Cowell here.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Insights from New York.
A quick introduction to a very complicated subject.
CIOB suggests the economic reach of construction is double the official figures.
The first US building to achieve BREEAM Outstanding In-Use.
70 buildings from 70 years of Concrete Quarterly. Book review.
Conserving the iron roof at the Albert Dock.
Delivering an infrastructure revolution.
The admissibility of evidence.
How many can you name? 37 anyone?
CIOB respond to the points-based system.
When is the weather considered 'exceptionally adverse'?