- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 12 Nov 2020
Auction theory relates to the design of auctions and how this influences the bidding strategies of the parties taking part in the auction. Auctions take place in which different parties bid for the right to purchase goods or, in the construction industry, to win tender contracts for project work.
The four traditional types of auction are:
- Bidders hand bids to the auctioneer. Upon opening, the most suitable bid wins, paying equal to the bid which is judged second-most suitable.
 Open descending-bid (Dutch auctions)
 ‘Winner’s curse’
An element of auction theory, which can impact upon the construction industry, is the ‘winner’s curse’. This is when a bidding contractor wins the auction with a bid that is too low for them to make a satisfactory profit, if any at all.
However, while it is common for tendering processes to favour lowest bids, the construction industry does not operate on a strictly first-price sealed-bid basis, as other factors also come into play. An existing working relationship between employer and tenderer might give the latter an advantage over tenderers who are unfamiliar to the employer.
The employer might also be prepared to select a higher bid because there is an expectation of higher quality and reliability. It is just as important for the employer that the tenderer does not suffer the ‘winner’s curse’, since the project will be likely to be impacted negatively as a result of the tenderer trying to rush, cut costs or even become insolvent.
 ‘Bid shopping’
A sealed-bid auction is intended to proceed with tenderers only knowing their bid and not those of their rivals. However, what can happen is that the employer reveals the bids of tenderers to their rivals in an attempt to drive bids down. This turns the design of the auction into more of an English auction, and puts tenderers at a disadvantage compared to the employer. One way of avoiding this in construction is for tenderers to withhold their bid submission until right before the deadline, in the hope that this will prevent their bid becoming common knowledge to rivals.
 Other forms of corruption
This occurs when a number of tenderers are involved in the auction process but only one of them places a bid, inevitably making them the winner. The tenderers collude together to rotate the title of ‘winner’ among themselves, meaning they are each assured of winning (unrivalled) a certain amount of work.
This is more common and involves all bar one of the tenderers submitting artificially high bids, while the one tenderer submits a lower bid which is still sufficiently high to ensure they make a profit. This is designed to give the impression of competition.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Best value.
- Bidding tactics
- Bid strategies.
- Bid writer.
- Bidding for renovation works.
- Contract award.
- Game theory.
- Invitation to tender.
- Negotiated tendering.
- OJEU procurement rules.
- Open tendering.
- Procurement route.
- Reverse auction.
- Selection criteria.
- Selective tendering.
- The benefits of e-procurement in construction.
- Tender evaluation.
Featured articles and news
Complete list of 2021 winners now available.
Recognising past and present role models for the future.
So why not write something?
LETI publishes guidance for energy efficient home retrofits.
Predictions about adequate post-pandemic IAQ in non-domestic buildings.
Government publishes plans to 'build back greener'.
The contentious nature of claims associated with cladding, fire safety and EWS1 forms.
ECA comments on low-carbon heating systems initiative and Heat and Buildings Strategy.
Cinders and other forms of domestic rubbish created filth but also generated great wealth.