Zero carbon non-domestic and allowable solution task group
In December 2006, the Labour government committed that from 2016 all new homes would be ‘zero carbon’. The Labour budget in 2008 then announced the government's intention that all new non-domestic buildings should also be zero carbon from 2019. This commitment was confirmed by the Coalition government in December 2010.
However, since then, there has been little progress towards the target for non-domestic buildings, or on the detail of the definition of 'zero carbon' for non-domestic buildings. As a consequence, in June 2015, the UK Green Building Council (UK-GBC) launched a zero-carbon non-domestic and allowable solution task group.
- The development by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) of the allowable solutions for zero-carbon homes.
- Possible changes to Part L of the building regulations as a ‘stepping stone’ towards the zero-carbon target.
The report proposed creating a task group ‘…to mobilise the membership … and to ensure that the Government makes the most of these upcoming opportunities, bringing forward policy that is as ambitious as possible, whilst remaining deliverable.”
The task group is jointly chaired by Julian Sutherland (Atkins) and David Mason (senior sustainability manager at Skanska).
Mason said, “The Allowable Solutions framework will be vital to delivering the zero carbon buildings policies and it presents a huge opportunity for the industry to innovate and find new ways of delivering carbon savings in the built environment.”
Julie Hirigoyen, chief executive of the UK-GBC, said, “Although the policy for non-domestic buildings remains under-developed, UK-GBC members are already pushing ahead. The overwhelming response we have had to this task group proves how many of our members are keen to start designing and delivering zero carbon new buildings, in view of the clear business benefits.”
The task group was expected to report in October/November 2015. However, on 10 July 2015, the government published ‘Fixing the foundations: creating a more prosperous nation’ a government plan for increasing Britain’s productivity. Amongst a great number of wide-ranging changes, the report states, 'The government does not intend to proceed with the zero carbon Allowable Solutions carbon offsetting scheme, or the proposed 2016 increase in on-site energy efficiency standards, but will keep energy efficiency standards under review, recognising that existing measures to increase energy efficiency of new buildings should be allowed time to become established.'
This announcement was made with no consultation and came as a surprise to much of the industry. Julie Hirigoyen said "It is short-sighted, unnecessary, retrograde and damaging to the house building industry, which has invested heavily in delivering energy-efficient homes".
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Urban Heritage, Development and Sustainability: international frameworks, national and local guidance.
What will the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) mean for you when they come into force in May?
Business Secretary chairs a new taskforce to monitor and advise on mitigating the impacts of Carillion’s liquidation.
Sir John Armitt is appointed the new chair of the National Infrastructure Commission.
High quality and high density homes - is it what we need or is it storing up trouble?
Government announces its intention to strengthen planning rules to protect music venues and neighbours.
National Audit Office reports that there is little evidence that PFI offers better value than other forms of contracting.
What is liquidation and how does it apply to contractors in the construction industry?
Scrutiny is placed on Carillion's controversial 2013 decision to extend subcontractor payment terms to 120 days.
RSHP unveil their involvement in a boundary crossing which will provide a new entry point into Hong Kong.
With PFI currently under the spotlight due to Carillion, this introductory article explains what they are.
Estimates suggest that up to 30,000 small firms could be at risk of non-payment as a result of Carillion's collapse.