Liquidated v unliquidated damages
Construction contracts generally include a provision for the contractor to pay liquidated damages (or liquidated and ascertained damages, sometimes referred to as LADs) to the client in the event that the contract is breached.
Liquidated damages are a pre-agreed amount of money that is set out in advance in the contract, that fixes the sum payable as damages if the contractor breaches the contract - typically by failing to complete the construction works by the completion date set out in the contract. Liquidated damages are typically calculated on a daily or weekly basis.
Unliquidated damages are damages that are payable for a breach, the exact amount of which has not been pre-agreed. The sum to be paid as compensation is said to be ‘at large’ and is determined after the breach occurs by a court
One of the advantages of a liquidated damages is that there is no need to prove the actual loss since the clause provides a pre-estimation of the damages to be paid. In addition to helping recover damages, this helps to provide certainty to the parties.
The advantage of unliquidated damages is that it allows for recovery of losses which may have been impossible to foresee or to estimate with any certainty before the breach.
If the contract contains an applicable liquidated damages clause, the client is generally not permitted to disregard and claim unliquidated damages instead.
In standard form construction contracts, parties will sometimes insert ‘NIL’ or ‘n/a’ for the rate for liquidated damages, if they do not wish to claim liquidated damages, however, this can imply that losses for unliquidated damages are also nil. If parties wish to exclude liability for liquidated damages, they must state this clearly in the contract to avoid ambiguity, either stating that unliquidated damages apply, or deleting the clause altogether.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Breach of contract.
- Collateral warranty.
- Completion date.
- Damages in construction contracts.
- Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd.
- Liquidated damages.
- Measure of damages.
- Penalty.
- Practical completion.
- The distinction between liquidated damages clauses and penalty clauses.
- Unliquidated damages.
Featured articles and news
Cross-ventilation in buildings. Do you have it ?
Will you need it ? after June 15 and the new Part O ?
Share your knowledge with the industry.
Create and account and write the first of many articles.
The green jobs delivery group.
CIAT commentary after the first meeting.
Liverpool's world heritage site status
Who is to blame?
Research recommends focussing on portfolio success rather than project success.
ICE and BSI launch revised PAS 128 standard.
The revised standard for mapping underground utilities.
Launching the UK net zero carbon buildings standard.
Cross-industry steering group seeks support in delivery.
How to write an inspection and test plan.
Help us update process pieces from your field.
APM report explores existing practice.
Previous reflections on mental health with CIAT.
COVID-19 and the importance of mental wellbeing.
IHBC accreditation recognised by CSCS
As Professionally Qualified Person (PQP).
The Queens speech; bill by bill for 2022.
In order of relevance and with industry responses.
Mental Health awareness week, May 9-15.
Raising awareness of the impacts of loneliness.
Rapidly renewable materials and construction.
The list is growing, and in more ways than one.
Personal experiences of infrastructure maintenance issues.
We shouldn’t build new, If we can’t maintain what's built.
Mass timber: challenges and potential solutions.
Timber Accelerator Hub phase 1 report