Conciliation in construction disputes
NB: ICE contracts have been withdrawn in favour of NEC contracts (Ref ICE) and the term ‘conciliation’ is gradually falling into disuse, regarded instead as a form of mediation.
Conciliation using the Institution of Civil Engineers’ Conciliation Procedure (1999) is a process that may be used at any time by agreement of parties who have contracted under the ICE family of contracts and associated subcontracts.
Once the parties have agreed to take part in the conciliation process, there is no right given under the ICE Procedure for a party to object to the appointed conciliator. Overall, the process set out in the Procedure gives very wide discretion to the conciliator as to how the conciliation is to be conducted; but, in practice, the process adopted is usually very similar to that for a typical mediation.
The principal difference between mediation and ICE conciliation arises when progress towards a settlement breaks down as, for example:
- when the conciliator is of the opinion that it is unlikely that a settlement will be achieved;
- a party fails to comply with some instruction of the conciliator; or
- either party indicates they do not wish to proceed towards a negotiated settlement.
In such circumstances the conciliator prepares a ‘recommendation’ which sets out their solution to the dispute. The various ICE contracts provide that if the conciliator makes a recommendation, and neither party dissents from that recommendation within one month of its issue by referring the dispute to adjudication or arbitration, then the recommendation becomes final and binding.
A similar situation applies when a dispute review board (sometimes referred to as a dispute resolution board DRB), appointed under the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Rules, issues a ‘recommendation’ with respect to any dispute referred to it. If no party expresses dissatisfaction with a recommendation within a stated time period, the parties contractually agree to comply with it.
If a party does express dissatisfaction with the recommendation within such time period, that party may submit the entire dispute to arbitration, if the parties have so agreed, or the courts. Pending a ruling by the arbitral tribunal or the court, the parties may voluntarily comply with the recommendation, but are not bound to do so.
This article was created by --University College of Estate Management (UCEM) 15:45, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Alternative Dispute Resolution.
- Adjudication.
- Arbitration.
- Conciliator.
- Dispute resolution boards.
- How does arbitration work?
- Mediation.
- The role of the mediator.
[edit] External references
Featured articles
Check out some of the best features and news from Designing Buildings as well as key stories from around the web.
Historic England publishes research into embodied carbon when retrofitting traditional buildings.
New Prime Minister delivers on ECA call for cut in electricity costs.
CIOB reacts to the announcement of Andy Burnham as Prime Minister.
Heritage and conservation science workforce survey - Have your say.
England's Suburbs 1820-2020. Book review.
New, more proportionate and targeted approach for higher-risk building assessments.
Government brings British Steel into public ownership.
UKCW Birmingham returns with bold new theme and focus.
New guidance published on competence requirements for self-certification schemes.
Construction Management, 8 July
NEETs crisis drives interest in trades, but apprenticeships barriers remain.
Passive fire protection webinar
MEP services penetration seals.
Where its at podcast (and video) - The role of the Architectural Technologist as an Expert Witness.

















