- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 16 Oct 2018
Default in construction contracts
The 'default' in CCRs 3134/2013 is an addition to the invoice which is automatically added without consent from the consumer. Default means the additional charge is continuously in operation, such that the consumer is opted-in to the charge by the trader without consent being received by the trader.
This might be an optional service charge percentage for good on-time work, added by coding the accounting system. The regulation requires express consent to have been received by the trader before the consumer is bound by the contract.
A default is a non-material breach of contract, whereby one party fails to perform a contractual obligation. What specifically constitutes a default will be set out in the contract terms, but generally, it can be defined as an omission or a failure to do what is expected or required.
If one party defaults, the other party may make a claim for damages, but may not consider it is discharged from any further obligations under the contract. This prevents the innocent party from avoiding their overall obligations because of a minor breach of just one part of the contract.
This is different from a serious, material breach of contract (although the distinction is not clear cut) which may allow the innocent party to consider that they are discharged from any further obligations under the contract.
 Find out more
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
Insight paper examines nuclear and net zero goals.
Suburban Americana with a secret past.
New planning rules to protect theatres, concert halls and music venues.
Public engagement in London Borough of Enfield's heritage strategy.
Engineering services in the spotlight.
The Government's Summer 2020 economic update.
Getting organised below the surface.
Securing suitable water systems.
Love them or hate them, they are popping up everywhere.
The initiative to enhance the environment continues.
Could underused community spaces offer an alternative to working from home?