- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 06 Jun 2017
Time of the essence in construction contracts
The term ‘Time is of the essence’ refers to a contractual position in which, if one of the parties to the contract fails to complete their obligations by a specified date, then the other party can treat the contract as terminated. This might be appropriate for example in the supply of perishable goods where late delivery would go to the ‘root’ of the contract, depriving the innocent party of the whole benefit of the contract. They may then terminate the contract and claim damages.
Time can be of the essence if the contract says it is, or where it can be implied from the contract. Setting a completion date is not sufficient to make time of the essence. However, where one party has caused delay, the other party can give notice requiring completion by a certain date, thereby making time of the essence.
Typically on construction contracts, time is not of the essence, but rather a completion date is set (the date by which practical completion must be certified). There are generally mechanisms allowing the completion date to be adjusted, and liquidated damages can be claimed by the client if delays that are the fault of the contractor result in a failure to complete the works by the completion date. However, the contract is not terminated, and to do so would generally not be in the interests of either party.
If ‘time is at large’, ie there is no date for completion, or the date for completion has become invalid (with no mechanism for extension), then the contractor is no longer bound by the obligation to complete the works by a certain date. The client would then not be able to claim liquidated damages from the contractor and the contractor would only have to complete the works in a 'reasonable' time. The client would then only be entitled to damages if they could established that the contract was not completed within a reasonable time.
Whilst time is generally not of the essence in construction contracts, they do tend to include a requirement that the contractor proceeds ‘regularly and diligently’ irrespective of whether it is apparent that the completion date will be achieved.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
How to get results with building life cycle assessment.
Government publishes a prospectus inviting proposals for new 'garden communities'.
The Morandi motorway bridge in Genoa collapses during rainstorm while undergoing maintenance works.
'Developed design' is a phrase coined by the RIBA for their 2013 Plan of Work. But what does it actually mean?
New green paper published aiming to rebalance the relationship between landlords and residents and tackle stigma.
RIBA calls for a comprehensive ban on combustible materials.
Lump sum contracts can be referred to as ‘fixed price’ contracts, although strictly this is not correct. Find out more here.
Ramboll offer guidance to civil engineers on how to make projects 'off-site ready'.
Government announces its Rough Sleeping Strategy, with further funding for social housing.
An overlooked architect who deserves to be celebrated for his wide range of buildings.
The Home Quality Mark ONE technical manuals for new homes are now available.