Typically, vicarious liability arises where an employer is held liable for the actions or omissions of its officers or employees performing duties in the course of their employment. This liability is not dependent on the employer having done anything wrong themselves.
Very broadly, the tests for vicarious liability are:
- Whether the employer was in control of the other party.
- Whether the act or omission was closely connected with their duties.
This does not restrict vicarious liability to ‘authorised’ actions or omissions. Vicarious liability can exist if authorised actions have been carried out carelessly or wrongfully, although there becomes a point where the action is carried out in such a way that it is outside the course of their employment and they may be considered to be acting independently, in a personal capacity.
In construction, vicarious liability may arise where the employees of a contractor act in such a way in the course of performing their duties so as to cause harm to another employee, the worker of another contractor or a member of the public.
Vicarious liability may also arise where a ‘superior’ is deemed to be in control of a party even where they are not their employer, for example:
- An employer might be held liable for the actions of clients or customers if they are under their control.
- A contractor ‘lending’ an employee to a subcontractor may still retain effective control over them.
- A subcontractor that is ‘integrated’ into a contractor organisation so that they are behaving as if they are an employee.
However, the interpretation of ‘control’ is likely to be applied narrowly in such circumstances. Control is not demonstrated by ‘supervision’, and might be difficult to establish if a subcontractor is skilled.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Appointing consultants.
- Contract v tort.
- Construction contract.
- Health and safety.
 External reference
- Biffa Waste Services v Maschinen Fabrik (2009)
Featured articles and news
Christiania is an anarchist 'freetown' in Copenhagen where strange and experimental architecture has flourished.
“UK waste data needs improving” say BRE specialists, in this summary of their report into construction waste.
UandI announce new joint venture with US developer to work on office refurbishment projects.
BSRIA give critical response to Theresa May's speech on leaving the EU.
Why buildings crack, how cracks are categorised and what can be done.
Inaugurated last week, the new Elbphilharmonie concert venue; a soaring new addition to Hamburg's skyline.
Summary of a new ICE Transport journal which says improving transport infrastructure is essential to eradicating global poverty.
BRE look at a new government report into the accuracy of heat meters.
Herzog & de Meuron get planning permission for revamp of Chelsea FC football stadium.
UK-GBC green paper proposes more powers for cities on new-build housing.
The Pompidou Centre – not a monument but an event.
Designing Buildings Wiki talks to the founder of the world's first indoor biophilic gym, now open in London.