Typically, vicarious liability arises where an employer is held liable for the actions or omissions of its officers or employees performing duties in the course of their employment. This liability is not dependent on the employer having done anything wrong themselves.
Very broadly, the tests for vicarious liability are:
- Whether the employer was in control of the other party.
- Whether the act or omission was closely connected with their duties.
This does not restrict vicarious liability to ‘authorised’ actions or omissions. Vicarious liability can exist if authorised actions have been carried out carelessly or wrongfully, although there becomes a point where the action is carried out in such a way that it is outside the course of their employment and they may be considered to be acting independently, in a personal capacity.
In construction, vicarious liability may arise where the employees of a contractor act in such a way in the course of performing their duties so as to cause harm to another employee, the worker of another contractor or a member of the public.
Vicarious liability may also arise where a ‘superior’ is deemed to be in control of a party even where they are not their employer, for example:
- An employer might be held liable for the actions of clients or customers if they are under their control.
- A contractor ‘lending’ an employee to a subcontractor may still retain effective control over them.
- A subcontractor that is ‘integrated’ into a contractor organisation so that they are behaving as if they are an employee.
However, the interpretation of ‘control’ is likely to be applied narrowly in such circumstances. Control is not demonstrated by ‘supervision’, and might be difficult to establish if a subcontractor is skilled.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Appointing consultants.
- Contract v tort.
- Construction contract.
- Health and safety.
 External reference
- Biffa Waste Services v Maschinen Fabrik (2009)
Featured articles and news
RSHP unveil their involvement in a boundary crossing which will provide a new entry point into Hong Kong.
With PFI currently under the spotlight due to Carillion, this introductory article explains what they are.
Estimates suggest that up to 30,000 small firms could be at risk of non-payment as a result of Carillion's collapse.
Sir Oliver Letwin to lead an independent review into the delays in the delivery of housing.
As Carillion collapses, read our article explaining insolvency in the construction industry.
43,000 jobs at risk as Carillion declares insolvency..
1961 saw the publication of three important books about urban design that remain relevant today.
Next week the planning fee increases by 20% and new fees are introduced.
How the transformative power of BIM and other digital technologies can be used to gain a competitive edge.
Relevant events and relevant matters are terms used in some contracts, but knowing the differences is important.
Government release statistics showing how many people are now on the property ladder due to Help to Buy schemes.