- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 09 Oct 2015
Typically, vicarious liability arises where an employer is held liable for the actions or omissions of its officers or employees performing duties in the course of their employment. This liability is not dependent on the employer having done anything wrong themselves.
Very broadly, the tests for vicarious liability are:
- Whether the employer was in control of the other party.
- Whether the act or omission was closely connected with their duties.
This does not restrict vicarious liability to ‘authorised’ actions or omissions. Vicarious liability can exist if authorised actions have been carried out carelessly or wrongfully, although there becomes a point where the action is carried out in such a way that it is outside the course of their employment and they may be considered to be acting independently, in a personal capacity.
In construction, vicarious liability may arise where the employees of a contractor act in such a way in the course of performing their duties so as to cause harm to another employee, the worker of another contractor or a member of the public.
Vicarious liability may also arise where a ‘superior’ is deemed to be in control of a party even where they are not their employer, for example:
- An employer might be held liable for the actions of clients or customers if they are under their control.
- A contractor ‘lending’ an employee to a subcontractor may still retain effective control over them.
- A subcontractor that is ‘integrated’ into a contractor organisation so that they are behaving as if they are an employee.
However, the interpretation of ‘control’ is likely to be applied narrowly in such circumstances. Control is not demonstrated by ‘supervision’, and might be difficult to establish if a subcontractor is skilled.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Appointing consultants.
- Contract v tort.
- Construction contract.
- Health and safety.
 External reference
- Biffa Waste Services v Maschinen Fabrik (2009)
Featured articles and news
PII provides insurance cover against negligence claims and is widely used where services are being provided.
Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners release first images of their planned new addition to the Toronto skyline.
Land which is, or was, occupied by a permanent structure; brownfield sites can have significant development potential.
The 3-day IHBC 2018 School will focus on; Our Shared heritage: Communication - Negotiation – Transformation.
An innovative 'green bench' is installed in London that absorbs as much pollution as 275 trees.
Book review – a series of essays about architecture and urbanism in the British Empire.
The complex situation where events occur at the same time.
How can Latin America and the Caribbean unlock the digital potential of their new and existing built environment?
CIOB publish a new code of estimating practice.
These relate to a programme where each activity is allocated a price and interim payments made against completion.
Have a look at these images from a new photography book of buildings being reclaimed by nature.