- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
Last edited 18 May 2015
Submission of evidence to the Edge commission of inquiry on future professionalism
This proposal was submitted as evidence to the Edge commission of inquiry on future professionalism.
The inquiry is intended to '...examine how the professional institutions and other representative bodies should address pressing issues facing the design and construction sector.' The Commission is chaired by Paul Morrell, former Chief Construction Advisor. Find out more.
The report of the Commission: Collaboration for Change, The Edge Commission Report on the Future of Professionalism, was published on 18 May 2015.
 A common standard for construction industry knowledge
There are complex and perhaps intractable issues surrounding the future of professionalism and whether institutions and other industry bodies will act together to reinforce the value of professionalism.
However, a number of straightforward steps can be taken to help the disparate industry disciplines integrate at a process level, without affecting the vested interests of individual organisations or professions. The introduction of Building Information Modelling (BIM) has been one such step, bringing about a significant leap forward in collaboration and efficiency without disrupting the historically established roles that make up the industry.
We propose a further, simple step that can be taken, which would build on the precedent established by BIM.
The construction industry, and its institutions in particular, recognise the necessity of sharing and disseminating knowledge, however, the processes and formats they adopt can mean they struggle to do this effectively. Currently a great deal of construction industry knowledge is published in pdf format, having been prepared as if it is a physical, printed document. This exploits none of the enormous potential of electronic publishing and makes knowledge difficult to find, share, interrogate, and use.
Construction industry knowledge should be:
- Flexible, so it is reusable across different platforms.
- Indexable, so different sources can be related to one another.
- Information rich, so it can be interrogated.
- Clearly attributed, with authorship and status information.
- Clearly licensed, so the conditions for re-use are easy to understand.
- Open, allowing, where appropriate, sharing and collaboration.
To achieve this, it is proposed that a simple, common standard should be established for the preparation and publication of construction industry knowledge:
- Providing straightforward guidance for the preparation of knowledge.
- Defining the properties which should be attached to knowledge, such as; date of creation, authorship and unique identification number.
- Offering a range of licences that set out the conditions for the re-use of material.
If the industry agreed such a standard, it would be easier to collaborate in the preparation of knowledge, easier to index and find knowledge, and easier to interrogate and use knowledge. It would be easier to take lessons learned from one project to the next and easier to share knowledge between different professions.
At its most basic level, if the industry simply agreed to allocate a unique identification number to each piece of knowledge it created, it would then be possible to index the entirety of construction industry knowledge in the UK and search it by subject, project, product, company, author or building.
This process change is entirely achievable, and would help to integrate the professions without changing their structure. Early consultation with industry institutes suggests there is strong interest in making this happen. The next proposed step is to fully assess the nature of construction industry knowledge and consider the options available for creating or adopting a common standard.
--designing buildings 13:17, 16 June 2014 (BST)
For more information see: Construction industry knowledge standard
Featured articles and news
How many can you name? 37 anyone?
CIOB respond to the points-based system.
When is the weather considered 'exceptionally adverse'?
ECA backs call for a rolling programme of rail electrification.
What does 'curtilage' mean and why does it matter?
Our duty to prevent harm and protect each other.
A quality perspective.
If buildings were people, they would be just starting to walk on two legs.
Air filtration and clean air standards.
The Dukes of Normandy and the second world war.
Conserving structures in historic designed landscapes.