Feedback your views
We'd love to hear what you think about Designing Buildings Wiki so we can make it better.
Do you like the design? Do you like the way it works? Do you find it helpful? Is there anything missing? Is there anything else you wish it could do? We really do want to know.
To tell us your views, you can either:
- Click 'Discussion' above and then and add your thoughts to the Discussion page.
- Click 'Submit Comment' below and send us your ideas.
- Email [email protected]uk.
To report abuse, click 'Report abuse' in Site info / tools.
Featured articles and news
Balfour Beatty fined £500,000 for exposing workers to hand-arm vibration.
James Brokenshire launches a consultation on banning combustible cladding.
A year after Grenfell, we have a collection of 30 articles telling you everything you need to know.
Infrastructure interconnectivity
ICE publish a policy paper on the UK’s future interconnectivity with the EU and the challenges for infrastructure.
Detailed guidance about construction waste management.
The changing identity of London communities in the face of rapid urbanisation.
Can you help? We have 300 industry acronyms beginning with 'C' but none beginning with 'Y'.
From the sinister Carceri d’Invenzione to the triple portrait of Sir Watkin Williams-Wynn and his Grand Tour travelling companions.
Design freeze: a quality perspective
Progressively freezing a design helps ensure it meets the specification when built.
BSRIA launch the 5th edition of the Design Framework for Building Services (BG 6/2018).
Stella Rimmington famously said the construction industry was just as tricky as the KGB.
CSCS
Construction site visitor cards are to be withdrawn.
Comments
[edit] Just click on 'Add a comment' and type your thoughts below
Your website looks good, but I think a spell checker may be useful. (There is a spell checker in the text editor - incorrect spellings are underlined in red - DBW)
Not clear whether I can be self promotional in my 'page about me'. (Yes you can - just not in your articles - DBW)
The orange hyperlinks make the text difficult to read. (This has been changed - DBW)
I like the way that you keep articles factual but allow them to have author's names in and link to a promotional page, it seems a very clever way of allowing ownership of ideas within a professional forum.
Hats off to you - this is just the kind of initiative the industry needs. So many professionals I work with (I include myself in this) find they need specialist information which impacts on their work but is outside their specific area - and until now there's been nowhere to find it. I expect your site will become the secret reference for every professional before long!