Feedback your views
We'd love to hear what you think about Designing Buildings Wiki so we can make it better.
Do you like the design? Do you like the way it works? Do you find it helpful? Is there anything missing? Is there anything else you wish it could do? We really do want to know.
To tell us your views, you can either:
- Click 'Discussion' above and then and add your thoughts to the Discussion page.
- Click 'Submit Comment' below and send us your ideas.
- Email [email protected]uk.
To report abuse, click 'Report abuse' in Site info / tools.
Featured articles and news
Read about the launch event for our major new report about the worrying and widening construction knowledge gap.
The construction knowledge gap
We've analysed 6 million pieces of data to reveal that the knowledge framework underpinning the construction industry is no longer fit for purpose.
An introduction to retrofitting.
Retrofitting traditional buildings depends on understanding how they differ from modern construction.
The theme for BSRIA's 2017 Briefing is 'Solutions to Tomorrow’s Challenges in Today’s Buildings'.
Dealing more than 1,700 consultations was just one of last year’s tasks for the Gardens Trust.
Read about the history behind one of California's most iconic buildings, the Griffith Observatory.
ICE examine just how close we are to providing subsidy-free low carbon electricity.
Have a look at MAD Architects' design proposal for renovating Montparnasse Tower into a concave mirror.
Off-site goods and materials - legal issues
This article examines the legal issues behind off-site goods and materials.
Read about how technology is changing the real estate industry.
BRE Global introduce the first registration scheme for Suitably Qualified Security Specialists.
Comments
[edit] Just click on 'Add a comment' and type your thoughts below
Your website looks good, but I think a spell checker may be useful. (There is a spell checker in the text editor - incorrect spellings are underlined in red - DBW)
Not clear whether I can be self promotional in my 'page about me'. (Yes you can - just not in your articles - DBW)
The orange hyperlinks make the text difficult to read. (This has been changed - DBW)
I like the way that you keep articles factual but allow them to have author's names in and link to a promotional page, it seems a very clever way of allowing ownership of ideas within a professional forum.
Hats off to you - this is just the kind of initiative the industry needs. So many professionals I work with (I include myself in this) find they need specialist information which impacts on their work but is outside their specific area - and until now there's been nowhere to find it. I expect your site will become the secret reference for every professional before long!