Confirmation of verbal instruction
Broadly, instructions may be given:
- To vary the works.
- To postpone the works.
- To remedy workmanship, goods or materials which are not in accordance with the contract.
- To sanction a variation made by the contractor.
- In relation to the expenditure of provisional sums.
- To open up work for inspection.
- To carry out tests.
- To exclude persons from the site.
The contractor must comply with the instructions within certain limitations. They have the right to ‘reasonably object’ to an instruction, and instructions can only be given as empowered by the contract.
Generally, instructions must be made formally, in writing, following a procedure set out in the contract. However, it is common for contracts to allow instructions to be given verbally, for example during a meeting, a site visit, or in an emergency situation. In this case, either the contract administrator should then confirm the instruction in writing to the contractor, or the contractor should confirm the instruction in writing to the contract administrator. If the receiving party does not dissent from the written confirmation, then the instruction will take effect.
This confirmation is referred to as a confirmation of verbal instruction (CVI) or an oral confirmation sheet. The contract should set out the exact procedures and the timescales for issuing such an instruction and dissenting from it.
Contracts can be vague about the nature of such confirmations, other than that they should be given in writing. Generally they should include:
- Details of who it is issued by and who it issued to.
- The date.
- Details of the contract that permits the instruction.
- The number of the CVI.
- Details of the instruction.
- The signature of the party issuing the CVI.
It is sensible to send an instruction by recorded delivery, or to confirm its receipt in the minutes of subsequent meetings. On some projects, there may an automated system in place for capturing and managing CVI’s and other instructions.
If a formal procedure is not followed for confirming verbal instruction, there can be disputes about:
- Work that has not been done which the contract administrator believes have been agreed.
- Work that the contractor has done but the client does not wish to pay for.
- Whether the instruction has been given to the right person, by the right person.
- Whether the instruction is allowed under the contract.
- Whether it has been properly valued and the value agreed.
- Whether the consequences on the programme have been properly considered.
- Whether an extension of time should be awarded.
Some contracts may make it a condition precedent to works being carried out that instructions are issued in writing. However, this can put the contractor in a difficult position, and whether to proceed with the works or to wait for a written instruction may be a commercial rather than a legal decision.
 Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Alternative dispute resolution.
- Architects instruction
- Change control
- Compensation events.
- Contract administrator.
- Contract sum.
- Defects liability period.
- Extension of time.
- Oral variation to written contract.
- Provisional sums.
- Relevant event.
Featured articles and news
Leaps, not steps, are needed to avoid a ticking time bomb, say BRE in response to Farmer Review.
A multi-purpose hall in France covered in a translucent orange membrane.
Winning designs revealed for a rock formation-influenced residential complex in Rennes.
An article explaining the techniques, regulations and environmental impacts of carbon capture and storage.
Watch one of the first documentaries by the acclaimed Adam Curtis, examining the substandard system building of the 1960s.
Take a look at the tech start-up that could transform construction design and communication.
This house in Barcelona uses an innovative new facade tiling system to blend into the landscape.
The origins, evolution and future of Level 3 BIM.
For new and returning Urban Design students, check out our article list divided up into the modules you'll be studying.
Report states that health of urban dwellers could be significantly improved by rethinking transport design.
The Kremlin, the centre of Russian power, includes some of the country's finest architecture.