- Project plans
- Project activities
- Legislation and standards
- Industry context
- Specialist wikis
Last edited 10 Jun 2022
What will a switch to imperial units mean for UK infrastructure projects?
 Imperial implications
Since antiquity, a realm having a consistent and trusted set of weights and measures has been a key component of national governance. These units are essential for so many aspects to enable any economy to function smoothly and efficiently.
UK law currently requires metric units to be used for all trade purposes, with very limited exceptions. The UK government’s recent consultation on reviewing the choices available to businesses in terms how they measure goods could pave the way for greater use of imperial measurements.
 Consistency is key
We now know there are seven fundamental base units (length, mass, time, electrical current, temperature, amount of substance and luminous intensity). In turn, the internationally agreed standards system (SI) has set these on fundamental physical characteristics – used in almost every country on the globe (except one, and possibly now, two).
As an applied science, civil engineering works with these base and derived units to understand and communicate the behaviour of the materials we work with. The old imperial units operated on various bases – often base 12, which made halving and then quartering of a length easier.
Meanwhile, the SI system is all in base 10, which makes it much easier for arithmetic calculations, such as those that civil engineers do. Further, the units are related, so a litre of water has a mass of a kilogram – an especial boon for geotechnical engineers. Conversely, imperial units often have very irregular conversions, so while there are 16oz in a pound, there are 14 pounds in a stone – odd relationships now remembered generally by people who have retired.
The UK is a very international economy, trading extensively with the whole world and so consistency in those markets is vital – the realm we now operate in is global. British designers have punched above their weight internationally for many decades, assisted by their ability to work nimbly to a range of global codes.
This has put the UK in a strong position to influence the development of global engineering standards, while the US, despite its huge economic muscle, often struggles to gain the same traction. The British Standards Institution (BSI) as custodian for that global expertise and reputation continues to succeed. As we enter a fresh phase of frenzied competition for the best new standards to usher in a new ecological age, it’s vital that the UK voice remains prominent and trusted.
British manufacturers operate in global markets – none more so than for infrastructure products, where everything from trains to power stations are internationalised commodities. The UK as both an importer and productive exporter benefits from the opportunity to partake in these highly global supply chains. It reaps benefits in terms of access to the latest technologies and economies from using these international components. As we push for more modular and manufactured content to make our constructions cheaper, better, quicker and greener, consistency of units becomes ever more important.
Modern engineering systems are highly complex and difficult to integrate, with too many opportunities for misunderstanding and miscommunication. This can lead to errors, potentially leading to difficult rework, additional expenses and/or delays. In particular situations, it can lead to public safety issues caused by confusion. Making this situation worse by the introduction of a parallel system of units will lead to more project delays and cost overruns. Potentially in some situations, it could also compromise safety – possibly in quite serious ways. A full review of the safety implications would need to be held before imperial units could be countenanced as equivalent units for engineering design.
The authors are very sympathetic to some imperial units remaining. The pint has been esteemed for millennia and nothing is quite as disappointing on a sunny day as a half-litre of fluid that somehow is never quite enough. But a wholesale switch to imperial units for complex engineering calculations will carry costs and safety risks. Those implications must be carefully considered before any switch can take place.
This article first appeared on the ICE news and blog site with the same title on June 6 2022
- Bills of quantities.
- Black book.
- Code of measuring practice.
- Common Arrangement of Work Sections.
- Comparison of SMM7 with NRM2.
- New Rules of Measurement.
- RICS Property Measurement.
- RICS publishes Land Measurement for Planning and Development Purposes.
- Standard Method of Measurement SMM7
Featured articles and news
A must read for all built environment professionals.
A brief description of time in the sun.
Given by ICE President Ed McCann.
Two new research reports published by APM.
50% off APM Associate membership for Designing Buildings users.
A commentary from the insurance perspective.
In brief with further links.
A definitive book on a pioneer of green architecture.
Using heritage as a catalyst for reviving historic centres.
Declaration prioritising sustainable urbanisation adopted.
Some brief words about the actuator.
After 34 years at the Institute.
To support the next generation of engineers.
CIAT reporting from the Competition and Markets Authority.
Making sustainable construction number one priority.
Interview with ECA CEO.
Many provisions came into force on June 28, 2022.
With room to expand.
Refurbishment, Energy Efficiency, Indoor air and process.
Aluminium Composite Panels (ACP) is one example.
Write about something you know, help us build and grow !