English Perpendicular architecture
So much of this article is dead wrong and I have no idea how information here has lasted this many revisions without being corrected.
To start with, the first period of gothic architecture in England is called the Early English style, or first pointed. The fact that you have labelled the decorated period as "second pointed" should be a big clue that it wasn't the first gothic style in England. And considering Canterbury Cathedral is well known as being the first place gothic was applied in England, obviously the style they used there would be Early English or "first pointed". In fact, some parts of it arguably aren't even the fully developed Early English style yet, and are known as Transitional Gothic- ie, between transitioning stylistically between Norman and Gothic.
The English gothic styles are separated typically as follows:
Early English (late 12th to mid 13th century)
Decorated (Geometric mid 13th to early 14th century, Curvilinear early 14th to mid 14th century)
Perpendicular (mid 14th century to mid 16th century, and not the early 15th century as stated in this article; English gothic is well known for having continued later than gothic on the continent, something you even state later on!).
Wells cathedral is quite famously the first fully gothic cathedral in England. It was entirely built in the Early English style, NOT the Decorated (SECOND pointed) style. The quire was later REBUILT in the later decorated style. The west front of the cathedral is quite clearly in the Early English style, bar the upper stages of the towers which are in the Perpendicular style. There are no Decorated period features on the west front.
You state that Perpendicular columns were circular when that's not really the case, they were far more likely to be compound piers or octagonal. The capitals are far more likely to be simple oak leaf designs or octagons.
Saying "spires were replaced by towers" is complete nonsense. Spires are built ON towers. It was simply more likely that spires were omitted in favour of pinnacled and battlemented parapets.
You show Ely Cathedral's west tower as an example of the Perpendicular style when the vast majority of it is CLEARLY Early English style (the lancets without foils are a dead giveaway). Only its very top stage is in the Perpendicular style. Even the more famous central octagon (which the picture doesn't show) dates to the 1320s, before the Perpendicular Period.
Describing the transition to renaissance styles over the course of the the Tudor dynasty as "more dramatic, realistic, and fluid" is just nonsense. What makes them more dramatic? What makes it more "realistic?" What makes it more "fluid"? Renaissance architecture is based on forms derived from the classical period- the architecture of ancient Rome and Greece. It can hardly be described as any more "Dramatic, realistic or fluid" than gothic. Not to mention that there is no sharp transition to renaissance architectural styles in England as there were on the continent. Tudor architecture came from the intermingling of late Perpendicular Gothic and Renaissance styles.
You mention the Oxford Movement being in the 18th century when it started in the 1830s, and post-dates gothic revival. In fact, gothic never completely died out, and gothic buildings, though limited in number, were still being built throughout the 17th and early 18th century, just not on quite the scale as the medieval cathedrals of before- a period sometimes called "Gothic Survival". Gothic revival does indeed start in the 18th century, but many famous pieces of gothic revival predate the influence of the Oxford Movement, like Strawberry Hill House. However, even using the Palace of Westminster as an example in an article about Perpendicular style, you neglect to mention that the palace is built specifically in a revival the Perpendicular style!
This article was incredibly poor and made glaring errors throughout of pretty basic English Gothic knowledge. It provided very few good examples of Perpendicular- why not showcase somewhere like Kings College Chapel? The nave of Canterbury cathedral (unless you make another mistake with that reference)? Wool churches could have used a mention here considering they were very typically built in Perpendicular style? How about a focus on the panel tracery of the period? The battlementing of parapets? The four centred arch and its widespread application throughout? The shedding of Decorated period elements such as the ball flower? This was lazy, and is less informative than a 1-minute glance at wikipedia.
Thank you for your detailed and informative comments. You are clearly well informed on the subject matter. As this is a wiki you can add corrections to the article as you see fit, or alternatively share your knowledge by creating a new article. A brief search shows that the wiki does not have any articles entitled; Early English style, first or second pointed, Transitional Gothic etc so defining these in brief new articles would be a valuable exercise. Thank you again for taking the time to comment, we are happy for contributions to article pages and view them all as works in progress, open for improvement by our users. Kind Regards.
You must sign in or register to edit or comment on an article
Return to Talk:English Perpendicular architecture.
Featured articles and news
Not buildings. Happy holiday from DB.
Improving government projects with data and AI
Enabling better outcomes, efficient modern delivery and influential leadership on government projects.
BSRIA Living Laboratory Innovation Challenge
Final days for submission, closing March 29.
Windows, their frames, forms, factors and functions.
The hidden subtleties of U-Value calculations
Different contexts and what to include as variables.
A brief run down with related articles.
Electrical sector calls for safer public EV charge points
Serious concerns about electrical safety in the public domain.
Building Blocks manifesto presented to parliament
Architects Declare call in for support of five critical policies.
The four elements of project management with APM
Analysis, expectations, collaborative communication and partnerships.
City of London launches Heritage Building Retrofit Toolkit
Empowering owners to initiate necessary adaptations.
Guidance on RAAC in listed buildings
Published by Purcell, endorsed by IHBC, SPAB and C20.
Learning from the past.
Reluctance to hire people with criminal convictions revealed
Employing People with Criminal Convictions Report.
Tackling unconscious bias; Women's History Month
Personal reflections, as the last week of March approaches.