<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/skins/common/feed.css?301"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?feed=atom&amp;target=QS_1&amp;title=Special%3AContributions%2FQS_1</id>
		<title>Designing Buildings - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/index.php?feed=atom&amp;target=QS_1&amp;title=Special%3AContributions%2FQS_1"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Special:Contributions/QS_1"/>
		<updated>2026-04-29T12:39:05Z</updated>
		<subtitle>From Designing Buildings</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.17.4</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Talk:Construction_2025</id>
		<title>Talk:Construction 2025</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Talk:Construction_2025"/>
				<updated>2014-02-21T14:43:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;QS 1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is anyone else of the opinion that the Construction 2025 report is similar to the rubbish we have been reading in previous reports?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>QS 1</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>